多元共治的社区微更新 ——基于浦东新区缤纷社区建设的实证研究

Multiple Participation in Community Micro-renovation: An Empirical Study Based on the Colorful Community Construction in Pudong New Area

赵 波
同济大学建筑与城市规划学院 硕士研究生 浦东新区规划和土地管理局 规划管理处 工程师

摘要: 缤纷社区建设是上海市浦东新区在社会治理创新背景下开展的社区多元共治的实践。以社区微更新为载体，探索一条符合超大城市特点和规律的社会治理新路。在多元共治的理论和实践解析的基础上，系统梳理两年来浦东新区缤纷社区实践，提炼出缤纷社区建设的核心要素，包括缤纷社区内容、多元主体角色、共同治理方法。通过调查和访谈，重点分析社会组织为媒、专业人士为媒、企业为媒3个典型模式，并对下一步缤纷社区建设提出优化策略，为其他城市开展社区微更新工作提供可复制、可推广的经验。

Abstract: The construction of colorful community is the practice of community pluralistic community-governance in Pudong New Area under the background of social governance innovation. It takes the community micro-innovation as the carrier to explore a new way of social governance which is in line with the characteristics and laws of the super cities. On the basis of the theory and practice analysis of co-governance, this paper systematically combs the colorful community practice in Pudong New Area in last two years and extracts the core elements of the colorful community construction, including the colorful community content, the multi roles and the common governance method. Through the investigation and interview, it focuses on three typical modes including social organization oriented mode, professional oriented mode and enterprise oriented mode. Finally, the optimization strategy is put forward for the next step of community construction, which provides a replicable and popularized experience for other cities to carry out community micro-innovation.

关键词：微更新、社会治理 、公众参与

Keyword: Micro-renovation，Social governance ， Public participation

中图分类号：TU981

文献标识码: A

[1]马宏，应孔晋. 社区空间微更新——上海城市有机更新背景下社区营造路径的探索[J]. 时代建筑，2016（4）：10-17.
MA Hong, YING Kongjin. Exploration of community building under the background of urban organic renewal in Shanghai[J]. Time Architecture, 2016 (4): 10-17.
[2]霍亚茜. 论社会治理视角下的居民委员会困境与对策[J]. 求知导报，2017（26）：90-92.
HUO Yaqian. On the plight and countermeasures of residents' committees from the perspective of social governance[J]. A Guide to Knowledge, 2017 (26): 90-92.
[3]高红. 社区社会组织参与社会建设的模式创新与制度保障[J]. 社会科学，2011（6）：76-83.
GAO Hong. Model innovation and system guarantee of community social organizations participating in social construction[J]. Social Sciences, 2011 (6): 76-83.
[4]许志坚，宋宝麒. 台北市“社区规划师制度”详解[J]. 上海城市管理职业技术学院学报，2003（3）：36-40.XU Zhijian, SONG Baoling. The detailed explanation of the "community planner system" in Taipei[J]. Journal of Shanghai Polytechnic College of Urban Management, 2003 (3): 36-40.
[5]李凯翔. 厦门社区共同缔造模式与改进策略研究[D]. 泉州：华侨大学，2017.
LI Kaixiang. Research on Xiamen community's joint creation mode and improvement strategy[D]. Quanzhou: Huaqiao University, 2017.
[6]徐磊青，宋海娜，黄舒晴，等. 创新社会治理背景下的社区微更新实践与思考——以408研究小组的两则实践案例为例[J]. 城乡规划，2017（4）：43-51.
XU Leiqing, SONG Haina, HUANG Shuqing, et al. Practice and thinking of community micro renewal under the background of innovative social governance: taking two cases of 408 research group as an example[J]. Urban and rural planning, 2017 (4): 43-51.
[7]于海. 城市多元共治的整合逻辑：以浦东新区社区治理为例[Z].“同济规划TJUPDI”微信公众号，2018-01-05.
YU Hai. Integration logic of urban pluralistic co-governance: taking Pudong New Area community governance as an example[Z]. TJUPDI, 2018-01-05.