社区规划师推进下的社区更新及工作框架*

Study on the Community Regeneration Propelled by Community Planners and Its Frame

刘思思
同济大学建筑设计研究院(集团)有限公司 建筑师,硕士

徐磊青
同济大学建筑与城市规划学院 教授,博士生导师

摘要: 随着2015年中央城市工作会议提出城市可持续性、宜居性发展战略,当下中国城市更新的重点逐渐开始由“物”向“人”的转变,具体表现为各种形式的公众参与式社区更新、微更新研究和实践。在这个过程中,“社区规划师”发挥着不可替代的作用。基于对“城市更新”的发展梳理及国外或地区“社区规划师”的探索经验,从“反思”的规划关注点层面、“研究”的规划方法层面、“观察”的规划操作方法层面、“参与意识培育”的设计实践层面,对社区更新进行多方面再思考。结合“参与阶梯理论”,并在切实考虑我国国情的基础上,提出行动主义策略下的“社区规划师工作框架”,以期为我国社区更新带来新的思路和参考。

Abstract: With the Central Urban Conference raising the development strategy of urban sustainability and livability in 2015, the emphasis of China urban regeneration has been transforming from object to person. It appears as various studies and practices about public participation community renewal and micro-renewal. In this process, a community planner plays an irreplaceable role. Based on the development of urban regeneration and the experience of community planners, this study rethinks over urban regeneration in many aspects, such as the view of concerns by reflection, the view of methods by study, the view of operation by observation and the view of practice by participation encouragement. Combined with the ladder of participation, as well as the present situation of our state, this study puts forward the working frame for community planners in the way of activism, hoping to offer new ideas and references for the urban regeneration in our country.

关键词:城市更新、社区更新、社区规划师、公众参与、 工作框架

Keyword: Urban regeneration, Community regeneration, Community planners, Public participation,Working frame

中图分类号:TU981

文献标识码: A

资金资助

国家自然科学基金项目 “基于公共性的公共空间布局效能与关键指标研究:以中心商业区地块为例” 51778422

[1]翟斌庆,伍美琴. 城市更新理念与中国城市现实[J]. 城市规划学刊,2009(2):75-82.
ZHAI Binqing, Mee Kam Ng. The concept of urban regeneration and the city reality in China[J]. Urban Planning Forum, 2009 (2): 75-82.
[2]ALBERS G. 城市规划理论与实践概论[M]. 吴唯佳,译. 北京:科学出版社,2000.
ALBERS G. Introduction to theory and practice of urban planning[M]. WU Weijia, translate. Beijing: Science Press, 2000.
[3]王如渊. 西方国家城市更新研究综述[J]. 西华师范大学学报(哲社版),2004(2):1-6.
WANG Ruyuan. Summary of the researches on the urban renewal in western countries[J]. Journal of China West Normal University, 2004 (2): 1-6.
[4]张汉,宋林飞. 英美城市更新之国内学者研究综述[J]. 城市问题,2008(2):78-89.
ZHANG Han, SONG Linfei. Summary of the researches by domestic scholars on the urban regeneration in Britain and America[J]. Urban Problems, 2008(2): 78-89.
[5]张更立. 走向三方合作的伙伴关系:西方城市更新政策的演变及其对中国的启示[J].城市发展研究,2004,122(4):26-32.
ZHANG Gengli. Towards three-way partnership in urban regeneration: the western experience and implications to Chinese Cities[J]. Urban Studies, 2004, 122 (4): 26-32.
[6]程大林,张京祥. 城市更新:超越物质规划的行动与思考[J]. 城市规划,2004,28(2):70-73.
CHENG Dalin, ZHANG Jingxiang. City renewal: an action beyond physical plan[J]. City Planning Review, 2004, 28 (2): 70-73.
[7]管娟. 上海中心城区城市更新运行机制演进研究[D]. 上海:同济大学,2008.
GUAN Juan. The operation mechanism development of urban regeneration in Shanghai downtown: a study of Xintiandi, Bridge 8, Tianzifang[D]. Shanghai: Tongji University, 2008.
[8]缪鲲. 旧城有机更新文献综述[C]//建筑科技与管理学术交流会论文集. 北京:北京恒盛博雅国际文化交流中心,2015.
MIAO Kun. “Old organic update” literature review[C]//Architectural technology and management academic seminar proceedings. Beijing: Beijing Hengshengboya International Center for Cultural Exchanges, 2015.
[9]李芳晟. 国外公众参与型社区公共空间设计研究[D]. 大连:大连理工大学,2012.
LI Fangcheng. Study on the design of community public space in the form of pubic participation in foreign countries[D]. Dalian: Dalian University of Technology, 2010.
[10]HUGHES J, CARMICHAEL P. Building partnerships in urban regeneration: a case study from Belfast[J]. Community Development Journal, 1998, 22 (3): 205-225.
[11]方可,章岩. 《美国大城市生与死》之魅力缘何经久不衰——从一个侧面看美国战后城市更新的发展与演变[J]. 国外城市规划,1999(4):26-29.
FANG Ke, ZHANG Yan. The reason why the book of The Death and Live of Great American Cities is enduring: the development and evolution of urban regeneration in postwar America[J]. Urban Planning Overseas, 1999 (4): 26-29.
[12]BRENNAN A, RHODES J, TYLER P. The distribution of SRB challenge fund expenditure in relation to local-area need in England[J]. Urban Studies,1999(36): 12.
[13]NOON D. Economic regeneration and funding[M]//ROBERTS P, SYKES H. Urban regeneration: a handbook. London: Sage Publications, 2000.
[14]CARLEY M. Urban partnerships, governance and the regeneration of Britain's cities[J]. International Planning Studies, 2000, 5 (3): 273-297.
[15]DAVIES J. Partnerships and regimes: the politice of urban regeneration in the UK[M]. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2001.
[16]胥明明. 沟通式规划研究综述及其在中国的适应性思考[J]. 国际城市规划,2017,32(3):100-105.
XU Mingming. A review of studies on communicative planning and a reflection on its application in China[J]. Urban Planning International, 2017, 32 (3): 100-105.
[17]成钢. 美国社区规划师的由来、工作职业与工作内容解析[J]. 规划师,2013,29(9):22-25.
CHENG Gang. US non-governmental community planning responsibility, model, and content[J]. Planners, 2013, 29 (9):22-25.
[18]陈有川. 规划师角色分化及其影响[J]. 城市规划,2001,25(8):77-80.
CHEN Youchuan. The differentiation of the planner's role and its impact[J]. City Planning Review, 2001, 25 (8): 77-80.
[19]赵民.“社区营造”与城市规划的“社区指向”研究[J]. 规划师,2013,29(9):5-10.ZHAO Min. A discussion on community building and community preference in city planning [J]. Planners, 2013, 29 (9): 5-10.
[20]赵蔚. 社区规划的制度基础及社区规划师角色探讨[J]. 规划师,2013,29(9):17-21.
ZHAO Wei. Institutional foundation of community planning and the role of community planner[J]. Planners, 2013, 29 (9): 17-21.
[21]杨辰. 法国社区规划的历时性解读——国家权力与地方民主建构的视角[J]. 规划师,2013,29(9):26-30.
YANG Chen. Community planning and its diachronic analysis: national power and local democracy viewpoint[J]. Planners, 2013, 29 (9): 26-30.
[22]LEFEBVRE H. Droit la ville[M]. Paris: Antropos, 1967.
[23]杨芙蓉,黄应霖. 我国台湾地区社区规划师制度的形成与发展历程探究[J]. 规划师,2013,29(9):31-35.
YANG Furong, HUANG Yinglin. The formation and development of community planning in Taiwan[J]. Planners, 2013, 29 (9): 31-35.
[24]黄健敏. 台湾民众参与的社区营造[J]. 时代建筑,2009,2(9):36-39.
HUANG Jianmin. Community building participated by the grassroots in Taiwan[J]. Time+Architecture, 2009, 2 (9): 36-39.
[25]许志坚,宋宝麒. 民众参与城市空间改造之机制——以台北市推动“地区环境改造计划”与“社区规划师制度”为例[J]. 城市发展研究,2003,10(1):16-20.
XU Zhijian, SONG Baoqi. The mechanism of participatory improvement of urban space[J]. Urban Studies, 2003, 10 (1): 16-20.
[26]吴丹,王卫城. 深圳规划师制度的模式研究[J]. 规划师,2013,29(9):36-40.
WU Dan, WANG Weicheng. Shenzhen community planner pattern research[J]. Planners, 2013, 29 (9): 36-40.
[27]王吉勇. 共同城市:深圳移民城市的空间转型与城市治理探索[J]. 规划师论坛,2016,32(11):33-38.
WANG Jiyong. Common city: spatial transition and governance of migrant city[J]. Planners, 2016, 32 (11): 33-38.
[28]赵蔚,赵民. 从居住区规划到社区规划[J]. 城市规划汇刊,2002(6):68-80.
ZHAO Wei, ZHAO Min. From residential district planning to community planning[J]. Urban Planning Forum, 2002 (6): 68-80.
[29]GROAT L,WANG D.建筑学研究方法[M]. 王晓梅,译.北京:机械工业出版社,2005.
GROAT L,WANG D.Architectural research methods[M]. WANG Xiaomei, translate. Beijing: China Machine Press,2005.
[30]赵春丽,杨滨章,刘岱宗. PSPL调研法:城市公共空间和公共生活质量的评价方法[J].中国园林,2012(9):34-38.
ZHAO Chunli, YANG Binzhang, LIU Daizong. PSPL survey: the evaluation method for quality of public space and public life: the study on Jan Gehl's theory and method for public space design[J]. Chinese Landscape Architecture, 2012 (9): 34-38.
[31]袁媛. 同德围,协作式社区管理实践[J]. 城市中国,2016(12):42-47.
YUAN Yuan. Tongdewei, a practice of collaborative community management[J]. Urban Wisdom Advancing with China, 2016 (12): 42-47.
[32]饶惟. 基于“多元共治”的旧城更新规划机制研究——以厦门市为例[D]. 厦门:华侨大学,2015.
RAO Wei. Research on the planning mechanism of urban renewal based on "pluralistic governance": taking Xiamen city as an example[D]. Xiamen: Huaqiao University, 2015.
[33]李志强. 时隔37年中央缘何重启城市工作会议?[EB/OL]. (2015-12-22)[2018-07-03]. http://www.xinhuanet.com/politics/2015-12/22/c_128557061.htm.
LI Zhiqiang. Why the national leadership reconvene the city conference after 37 years? [EB/OL]. (2015-12-22) [2018-07-03]. http://www.xinhuanet.com/politics/2015-12/22/c_128557061.htm.
[34]张奕. 城市更新行动计划1:上海四大系列12个代表项目在哪里?[EB/OL].(2016-05-19)[2018-07-03]. http://web.shobserver.com/news/detail?id=17984.
ZHANG Yi. Urban regeneration action plan of Shanghai 1: where are the 12 representative projects of 4 series? [EB/OL]. (2016-05-19) [2018-07-03]. http://web.shobserver.com/news/detail?id=17984.
[35]柳森.“第一个吃螃蟹”的社区规划师[EB/OL]. (2018-01-20)[2018-07-03]. http://www.jfdaily.com/news/detail?id=77486.
LIU Sen. "The first mover" of community planners[EB/OL]. (2018-01-20) [2018-07-03]. http://www.jfdaily.com/news/detail?id=77486.

微信扫一扫
关注“上海城市规划”
公众号