生态城市规划方法启示下的海绵城市规划工具建立 ——基于敏感性和适宜度分析的海绵型场地选址模型*
Urban Planning Tool for Sponge City Enlightened by Ecological Planning: Identifying Sites for Sponge Space in Changchun Based on the Evaluation of Sensitivity and Suitability
赵宏宇
吉林建筑大学建筑与规划学院 城乡规划系 系主任，副教授 寒地城市设计研究中心 副主任
王浩锋
深圳大学建筑与城市规划学院 副教授，博士
赵建军
东北师范大学地理科学学院 副教授，博士
解文龙
哈尔滨工业大学建筑学院 博士研究生
摘要: 生态城市规划领域中较为成熟的量化分析方法能够为海绵城市规划研究提供重要借鉴。在提炼生态城市规划和灾害威胁
下建设用地规划研究框架的基础上，以长春为例，从多层筛选的视角探索基于敏感性和适宜度分析的海绵型场地选址研
究方法。以TOPMODEL模型为核心进行水文敏感性的指数化计算，划定水文敏感区和水文低敏感区；通过综述国内外雨
洪管理体系内涵与目标的发展历程，选定人口密度、空间整合度和城市蓝绿系统3个适宜度评价影响因子，并基于GIS的多
因子加权分析法进行海绵型场地适宜度评价，将建设区域分为最适宜、较适宜等5类用地；最后将敏感性与适宜度分析进
行叠加，选取具有最高敏感性和最高、较高适宜度的区域为海绵型场地选址区。以安全、社会、经济、生态等多价值提升为
目标构建可视化的海绵型场地选址研究方法，为海绵城市在城市规划层面的实现提供了新思维。
Abstract: The scientific quantitative analysis methods coming from ecological planning can be reference for sponge city. Taking Changchun
as the research object, we explore the research method of identifying sites for sponge space based on analysis of sensitivity and
suitability from multi-level filtering perspective. TOPMODEL is chosen to analyze hydrological sensitivity which is based on
calculation of topographic index. Through reviewing development process of connotation and objective of rain-flood management
system, three factors of population density, spatial integration and urban green system are ultimately selected for suitability
evaluation. Based on analysis of sensitivity and suitability, we identify the areas with highest sensitivity and highest, higher suitability
as the sites for sponge space. The visualized model of identifying sites for sponge space has been built, providing city managers with
scientific and quantitative analysis.
关键词：海绵城市、生态规划、水文敏感性分析、 适宜度评价、选址
Keyword: Sponge city， Ecological planning ， HSAs， Suitability evaluation，Identifying sites
中图分类号：TU981
文献标识码: A
资金资助
国家社会科学基金项目 “我国北方传统村落生态治水智慧文化遗产的挖掘与保护” 16BH130
[1]俞孔坚，李迪华，袁弘，等. “海绵城市”理论与实
践[J]. 城市规划，2015（6）：26-36.
YU Kongjian, LI Dihua, YUAN Hong, et al. Sponge
city: theory and practice[J]. City Planning Review,
2015(6): 26-36.
[2]车伍，赵杨，李俊奇，等. 海绵城市建设指南解读之
基本概念与综合目标[J]. 中国给水排水，2015（8）：
1-5.
CHE Wu, ZHAO Yang, LI Junqi, et al. Explanation
of Sponge City Development Technical Guide: basic
concepts and comprehensive goals [J]. China Water &
Waste Water, 2015(8): 1-5.
[3]李昂，赵天宇. 基于生态敏感性评价的严寒地区
林业村镇景观生态安全格局研究[J]. 中国园林，
2016（3）：85-89.
LI Ang，ZHAO Tianyu. Research on the landscape
ecological security pattern of forestry villages and
towns in cold regions based on ecological sensitivity
evaluation[J]. Chinese Landscape Architecture,
2016(3): 85-89.
[4]RENGER R, CIMIETTA A. Geographical information
system as an evaluation tool[J]. The American Journal
of Evaluation, 2002, 23(4): 469-479.
[5]闫艳. 北京延庆新城规划区地质灾害及其危险性
区划研究[D]. 北京：中国地质大学北京，2011.
YAN Yan, Research of geological hazards and risk
division for new town planning of Beijing Yanqing[D].
Beijing: China University of Geosciences, 2011.
[6]王晨懿. 地质灾害威胁下山地农村居民点用地规
划适宜性评价及空间模拟研究[D]. 成都：四川农
业大学，2011.
WANG Chenyi, Suitability evaluation and spatial simulation of mountainous residential area planning
against geological hazards[D]. Chengdu: Sichuan
Agricultural University, 2011.
[7]COLLINS M, STEINER F, RUSHMAN M.
Land-use suitability analysis in the United States:
historical development and promising technological
achievements[J]. Environmental Management，2001，
28(5)：611-621
[8]刘勇，张韶月，柳林，等. 智慧城市视角下城市洪涝模
拟研究综述[J]. 地理科学进展，2015（4）: 494-504.
LIU Yong, ZHANG Shaoyue, LIU Lin, et al. Research
on urban flood simulation: a review from the smart
city perspective[J]. Progress in Geography, 2015(4):
494-504.
[9]丁雨淋. 水文变化驱动的暴雨—洪涝灾害主动模
拟方法[D]. 武汉：武汉大学，2014.
DING Yulin, Hydrological changes driven flood
disaster simulation method[D]. Wuhan: Wuhan
University，2014.
[10]RENGER R, CIMETTA A. Geographical information
system as an evaluation tool[J]. The American Journal
of Evaluation, 2002, 23(4): 469-479.
[11]COLLINS K, LAWRENCE. Opportunities and
challenges for managing nitrogen in urban storm
water: a review and synthesis. Ecological Engineering,
36(11): 1507–1519.
[12]MARTIN C, BEURS K, JULIAN J, et al. Identifying
priority sites for low impact development (LID)
in a mixed-use watershed[J]. Landscape & Urban
Planning, 2015(140): 29–41.
[13]AGNEW L, GÉRARD-MARCHANT P, COLLINS
V, et al. Identifying hydrologically sensitive areas:
bridging the gap between science and application[J].
Journal of Environmental Management, 78(1): 63–76.
[14]车伍，吕放放，李俊奇，等. 发达国家典型雨洪管理
体系及启示[J]. 中国给水排水，2009（20）：12-17.
CHE Wu, LYU Fangfang, LI Junqi, et al. Typical
stormwater and flood management systems in
developed countries and their inspiratio[J]. China
Water & Waste Water, 2009(20): 12-17.
[15]车伍，闫攀，赵杨，等. 国际现代雨洪管理体系的发
展及剖析[J]. 中国给水排水，2014（18）：45-51.
CHE Wu, YAN Pan, ZHAO Yang, et al. Development
and analysis of international updated storm water
management systems[J]. China Water & Waste Water,
2014(18): 45-51.
[16]程江，徐启新，杨凯，等. 国外城市雨水资源利用
管理体系的比较及启示[J]. 中国给水排水，2007
（12）：68-72.
[17]CHENG Jiang, XU Qixin, YANG Kai, et al.
Comparison of foreign urban rainwater resource
utilization management systems and some
inspiration[J]. China Water & Waste Water, 2007(12):
68-72.
HILLIER B. Cities as movement of economies[J].
Urban Design International 1996(1): 41-60.
[18]READ S. Flat city: a space syntax derived urban
movement network model[C]//A.v.Nes（ed.）the 5th
Space Syntax Symposium Proceedings. Delft: Delft
University Press，2005.
[19]GIL J，STEINBACH P. From flood risk to indirect
flood impact: evaluation of street network performance
for effective management, response and repair[C]//1st
International Conference on Flood Recovery
Innovation and Response (FRIAR). 2008.
[20]胡楠，李雄，戈晓宇. 因水而变——从城市绿地系
统视角谈对海绵城市体系的理性认知[J]. 中国园
林，2015（6）：21-25.
HU Nan，LI Xiong，GE Xiaoyu. Change with
water: the rational cognition of sponge city system
from the perspective of urban green space[J]. Chinese
Landscape Architecture, 2015(6): 21-25.
[21]杨柳. 生态适宜度评价在城市规划中的应用——
以上海南桥新城总体规划为例[J]. 上海城市规划，
2012（6）：35-39.
YANG Liu. Application of ecological suitability
assessment in urban planning: a case study on master
plan of Nanqiao, Shanghai[J]. Shanghai Urban
Planning Review, 2012(6): 35-39.
[22]石垚，张微，任景明，等. 生态敏感区旅游开发适宜
性评价及生态制图方法[J]. 生态学报，2015（23）：
7887-7898.
SHI Yao，ZHANG Wei，REN Jingming, et al．
Ecological suitability assessment and eco-mapping
for tourism development in an Eco-sensitive region[J].
Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2015, 35(23): 7887-7898．
[23]肖扬，CHIARADIA A，宋小冬. 空间句法在城市
规划中应用的局限性及改善和扩展途径[J]. 城市
规划学刊，2014（5）：32-38.
XIAO Yang, CHIARADIA A, SONG Xiaodong. A
discussions on implementing space syntax method in
urban planning[J]. Urban Planning Forum, 2014(5):
32-38.
[24]伍敏，杨一帆，肖礼军. 空间句法在大尺度城市设
计中的运用[J]. 城市规划学刊，2014（2）：94-104.
WU Min，YANG Yifan，XIAO Lijun. The usage
of space syntax in general urban design[J]. Urban
Planning Forum, 2014(2): 94-104.
[25]侯利萍，何萍，钱金平，等. 河岸缓冲带宽度确定方
法研究综述[J]. 湿地科学，2012（4）：500-506.
HOU Liping, HE Ping, QIAN Jinping, et al. A review
on determination methods for width of riparian
buffer[J]. Wetland Science, 2012(4): 500-506.
