城市众筹：英国的参与式城市营建治理方式*
Civic Crowd-funding: A Participatory Mode of Urban Construction and Governance in the UK
朱旭佳
南京大学建筑与城市规划学院 硕士研究生
申明锐
南京大学建筑与城市规划学院 助理研究员，博士
罗震东
南京大学建筑与城市规划学院 副教授，博士
摘要: 后金融危机时代，西方发达国家面临经济萎靡、财税收入下跌等系列问题之时，城市更新需求及相应的财政负担却有增无
减。同时，面对新自由主义下的城市贫富差距日益加剧的状况，城市管理开始出现追求“城市权利”的思潮，强调社会正
义、多元性和人本性等价值。在此背景下，城市众筹作为调动社会力量参与城市空间改造和服务供给的新方式在信息技术
的支撑下诞生，并在多国获得发展，引领着新的城市空间营建和地方治理模式。聚焦英国的城市众筹实践，结合统计分析
和相关材料，剖析其平台设计、作用特点和流程机制，认为城市众筹这种新兴的参与式城市营建治理方式，具有提供更精
细化的城市服务，培育地方感、市民精神和艺术文化氛围，以及实现公众参与式城市营建与更新等方面的价值，值得日益
面临相似问题与挑战的中国城市关注。
Abstract: In post-crisis era, more developed countries are facing sluggish economy, tax revenue decline and other problems, whilst the city
renewed demand and the related financial burdens are surging. Meanwhile, with the influence of neo-liberalism which intensified the
gap between the rich and the poor, urban management has experienced a pursuit of ‘right to the city’ and the value of social justice,
pluralism and humanism. In this context, civic crowd-funding, as a new mode of mobilizing social forces to participate in urban space
construction and service supply, emerged against the information technology background. It has developed in a number of western
countries and led a new mode of urban space construction and local governance. This paper focuses on the practice of civic crowdfunding
in the UK and elaborates its platform design, functions, process and mechanisms through some statistics and materials
analysis. It is argued in the paper that, civic crowd-funding is worthy of further attention for China’s cities, with its value such as
providing more refined urban services, cultivating sense of place, public spirit, artistic and cultural atmosphere and achieving public
participation in urban construction and renewal.
关键词：城市众筹、公众参与、 治理、 城市更新、地方营造
Keyword: Civic crowd-funding， Public participation， Governance， Urban regeneration， Place making
中图分类号：TU981
文献标识码: A
资金资助
国家自然科学基金项目 “基于流空间的城镇发展战略分析方法与规划理论研究” 51478216
[1]PAULAIS T. Local governments and the financial
crisis: an analysis[M]. Washington DC: Cities
Alliance, 2009.
[2]VAN VEELEN T. Civic crowd-funding: a financial
kick start to urban area development? An analysis
of the institutional structure in which civic crowdfunding
in urban area[D]. Delft: Delft University of
Technology, 2015.
[3]张庭伟. 告别宏大叙事：当前美国规划界的若干
动态[J]. 国际城市规划，2016，31（2）：1-5.
ZHANG Tingwei. Farewell to growth promotion:
some topics in contemporary planning research in
the US[J]. Urban Planning International, 2016, 31
(2): 1-5.
[4]FREITAS J C, AMADO M. Crowd-funding in urban
planning: opportunities and obstacles[C]//RC43
Annual Conference. Amsterdam: Center of Urban
Studies, Netherland, 2013: 10-12.
[5]魏立华，丛艳国，魏成. 城市权利、政府责任与城
市人居环境建设的新思路[J]. 城市规划，2015，
39（3）：9-14.
WEI Lihua, CONG Yanguo, WEI Cheng. City
rights, government responsibilities and new thoughts
on urban human settlements[J]. City Planning
Review, 2015, 39 (3): 9-14.
[6]LOFTMAN P, NEVIN B. Prestige projects and
urban regeneration in the 1980s and 1990s: a review
of benefits and limitations[J]. Planning Practice &
Research, 1995, 10 (3-4): 299-316.
[7]戴维•哈维. 叛逆的城市[M]. 叶齐茂，倪晓晖，译.
北京：商务印书馆，2014.
HARVEY D. Rebel cities[M]. YE Qimao, NI
Xiaohui, translate. Beijing: The Commercial Press,
2014.
[8]曹现强，张福磊. 空间正义：形成、内涵及意义[J].
城市发展研究，2011，18（4）：131-135.
CAO Xianqiang, ZHANG Fulei. Spatial justice:
context, development and connotation[J]. Urban
Studies, 2011, 18 (4): 131-135.
[9]孙鹏. 西方社会思潮影响下的空间规划范式转
变——兼论城市规划与人文地理学的学科融合
[J]. 城市规划，2016，40（11）：67-71.
SUN Peng. Paradigm change of spatial planning
under the influence of western social thoughts:
discussion on disciplinary integration between urban
planning and human geography[J]. City Planning
Review, 2016, 40 (11): 67-71.
[10]孙莉，张玉坤. 前沿城市规划理念及21世纪对规
划师的新要求[J]. 国际城市规划，2016（1）：58-
64.
SUN Li, ZHANG Yukun. Advanced urban planning
concepts and the new requirements for planners in
the 21st Century[J]. Urban Planning International,
2016 (1): 58-64.
[11]FINN D. DIY urbanism: implications for cities[J].
Journal of Urbanism: International Research on
Placemaking and Urban Sustainability, 2014, 7 (4):
381-398.
[12]TALEN E. Do-it-yourself urbanism: a history[J].
Journal of Planning History, 2015, 14 (2): 135-148.
[13]GOODSPEED R, LORAL K. More than money:
civic crowd-funding for participatory community
development[EB/OL]. (2015-12-08)[2017-02-15]
https://www.planetizen.com/node/82617.
[14]DAVIES R. Three provocations for civic crowdfunding[
J]. Information, Communication & Society,
2015, 18 (3): 342-355.
[15]DAVIES R. Civic crowd-funding: participatory
communities, entrepreneurs and the political
economy of place[D]. Cambridge: MIT, 2014.
[16]BEST J. Crowd-funding’s potential for the
developing world, finance and private sector
development department[R]. Washington DC: World
Bank, 2013.
[17]Prime Minister's Office. Prime Minister hails the
rise of ‘civic crowd-funding’[EB/OL]. (2014-11-
27)[2017-02-13]. https://www.gov.uk/government/
news/prime-minister-hails-the-rise-of-civiccrowdfunding.
[18]Spacehive. The ultimate guide to crowd-funding[EB/
OL]. (2017-01)[2017-02-13]. http://about.spacehive.
com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/The-Ultimate-
Crowdfunding-Guide.pdf.
[19]周红云. 社会资本：布迪厄、科尔曼和帕特南的比
较[J]. 经济社会体制比较，2003（4）：46-53.
ZHOU Hongyun. Social capital: comparison among
Bourdieu, Coleman and Putnam[J]. Comparative
Economic & Social Systems, 2003 (4): 46-53.
[20]郑杭生，奂平清. 社会资本概念的意义及研究中
存在的问题[J]. 学术界，2003（6）：78-90.
ZHENG Hangsheng, HUAN Pingqing. Significance
of the concept of social capital and problems
existing in the process of research[J]. Academics,
2003 (6): 78-90.
[21]贺寨平，曹阳. 普特南社会资本理论评述[J]. 山西
师大学报（社会科学版），2014（3）：70-74.
HE Zhaiping, CAO Yang. A review of Putnam’s
theory of social capital[J]. Journal of Shanxi Normal
University (Social Science Edition), 2014 (3): 70-
74.
[22]JABAREEN Y.‘ Do it yourself’ as an informal
mode of space production: conceptualizing informality[J]. Journal of Urbanism: International
Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability,
2014, 7 (4): 414-428.
[23]魏寒宾，唐燕，金世镛. “文化艺术”手段下的城
乡居住环境改善策略——以韩国釜山甘川洞文
化村为例[J]. 规划师，2016，32（2）：130-134.
WEI Hanbin, TANG Yan, JIN Shiyong. Culture
and art based urban rural living environment
improvement: Gamcheon Culture Village, Busan,
Korean[J]. Planners, 2016, 32 (2): 130-134.
[24]FINN D. Introduction to the special issue on DIY
urbanism[J]. Journal of Urbanism International
Research on Placemaking & Urban Sustainability,
2014, 7 (4): 851-876.
