基于博弈论的邻避设施选址决策模型研究
Location Decision Making Model of NIMBY Facility Based on Game Theory
陈 晨
同济大学建筑与城市规划学院 博士研究生
摘要: 针对矛盾比较突出的邻避设施选址问题，借鉴博弈论的思想提出了选址博弈决策的理想模型，指出了达成共识方案的必要条
件。进一步地，将选址博弈模型在空间上进行了拓展，将模型中的策略与收益进行了空间与数值量化，并提出了一般的求解函
数。另外，针对各方博弈中可能出现的单方利益优先的情况，对函数进行了拓展，提出了考虑单方优先的求解函数。选取江苏省
泰州市的生活垃圾焚烧发电厂进行案例实证研究，比较初始和实施选址方案。研究发现，实施方案确实比初始方案更能够满足
居民方与建设方的利益，证明了调整后的实施方案更加优化。
Abstract: This paper proposes an ideal model of NIMBY facility’s location decision making based on the ideas from Game Theory. The necessary
conditions for consensus scheme are pointed in this paper. Furthermore, the general solution function is proposed by valuing the strategy and
benefits into numerical and spatial attributes. Then, the function is extended in order to consider possible unilateral priority in the game. A case
of life garbage incineration power plant in Taizhou of Jiangsu province has been used as empirical study by comparing the initial location plan
and implementation plan based on the calculation results of the function. The analysis result shows that the implementation plan is better because
the implementation one can provide more interests to both residents and builders.
关键词：邻避设施、博弈、选址决策、公众参与、空间收益
Keyword: NIMBY facility，Game Theory，Location decision，Public participation，Spatial benefits
中图分类号：TU981
文献标识码: A
[1]JASON J R. Multi-criteria GIS modeling of wind
and solar farms in Colorado [J]. Renewable Energy,
2010, 35(10): 2228-2234.
[2]张颖. 邻避型设施区位分析系统的建立与应用
[D]. 上海：华东师范大学硕士学位论文，2007.
ZHANG Ying. Establishment and application of
NIMBY facility location analyzing system[D].
Shanghai: The Dissertation for Master Degree of
East China Normal University, 2007.
[3]杨凌云，杨海根. 层次分析法在大型垃圾焚烧处
理项目场址比选中的应用[J]. 环境卫生工程，
2010，18（3）：38-43.
YANG Linyun, YANG Haigen. Application of
analytic hierarchy process in site selection of large
waste incineration projects [J]. Environmental
Sanitation Engineering, 2010, 18(3): 38-43.
[4]王健，陈海滨. 层次分析法在生活垃圾综合处理
项目选址中的应用[J].环境卫生工程，2011，19
（2）:7-10.
WANG Jian, CHEN Haibin. Application of
analytic hierarchy process in site selection of
domestic waste integrated treatment projects [J].
Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 2011,
19(2): 7-10.
[5]杭正芳. 邻避设施的区位选择与社会影响研究
[D]. 西安：西北大学博士学位论文，2013.
HANG Zhengfang. Research of location selection
and social impact of NIMBY facilities: A case
study of landfill in Xi’an [D]. Xi’an: The
Dissertation for Doctor Degree of Northwest
University, 2013.
[6]AHLFELDT G, MAENNIG W. Voting on a
NIMBY facility: proximity cost of an ''iconic''
stadium [J]. Urban Affairs Review,2012, 48(2):
205-237.
[7]SU B B, CHANG H, CHEN Y Z, HE D R, A
game theory model of urban public traffic network
[J]. Physical A: Statistical Mechanics and its
Applications，2007, 379(1): 291-297.
[8]MADANI K. Game theory and water resources [J].
Journal of Hydrology, 2010, 381(3): 225–238.
[9]王颖，孙斌栋. 运用博弈论分析和思考城市规划
中的若干问题[J]. 城市规划汇刊，1999（3）:
61-63.
WANG Ying, SUN Bindong. Using game theory
analysis and thinking about the several problems
in urban planning [J]. Urban Planning Review,
1999(3): 61-63.
[10]陈志龙，姜韡. 运用博弈论分析城市地下空间规
划中的若干问题[J]. 地下空间，2003（12）：431-
457.
CHEN Zhilong, JIANG Wei. Analysis on some
problems of urban underground space planning by
means of Game Theory [J]. 2003(12):431-457.
[11]LIN Yuchih, LIN Fengtyan. A strategic analysis of
urban renewal in Taipei City using game theory[J].Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design,
2014, 41(3): 472–492.
[12]Hotelling H. Stability in Competition[J]. The
Economic Journal. 1929, 39(153): 44-57.
[13]裴新生. 基于多元利益主体诉求的情景规划——
以酒（泉）—嘉（峪关）区域—体化空间布局
为例[J]. 城市规划学刊，2013（5）：80-86.
PEI Xinsheng. Scenario planning based on
multiple-stakeholder demand: a case of Jiuquan-
Jiayuguan regional integration planning [J]. Urban
Planning Forum, 2013(5): 80-86.
[14]钮心毅. 城市总体规划中的土地使用规划支持系
统研究[D]. 上海：同济大学博士学位论文，2008.
NIU Xinyi. Land use planning support system
for urban master planning [D]. Shanghai:
The Dissertation for Doctor Degree of Tongji
University, 2008.
[15]单玉红，朱欣焰. 基于多主体行为决策的城市居
住用地利用效用情景分析[J]. 自然资源学报，
2011，26（11）：1832-1841.
SHAN Yuhong, ZHU Xinyan. Scenario analysis of
urban residential land use utility based on multiagents’
spatial decision [J]. Journal of Natural
Resources, 2011,26(11):1832-1841.
[16]程遥. 超越“工具理性”——试析大众传媒条件
下城市规划公众参与[J]. 城市规划，2007，31
（11）: 57-63.
CHENG Yao. Transcending ‘instrumental
reason’[J]. Urban Planning Review, 2007, 31(11):
57-63.
