1990年代以来英国的城市更新实施政策演进及其对 我国的启示*
Studies on Evolution of Implementation Policies of Urban Renewal in UK since 1990s and Their Policy Implications for China
严雅琦
同济大学建筑与城市规划学院 硕士研究生
田 莉（通讯作者）
清华大学建筑学院 教授，博士生导师，博士
摘要: 半个多世纪以来，英国在城市更新上进行了大量的实践，积累了丰富的经验。在回顾20世纪中后期以来英国城市更新的历程演
变的基础上，着重介绍了20世纪90年代以来的更新实施配套政策，包括城市挑战、综合更新预算和社区新政政策的背景、框架、
实施机制和成效等，最后结合我国现阶段城市更新的现状，提出借鉴英国城市更新实施政策，实现从房地产开发导向的更新向
社会、经济、环境的综合更新转型，从政府或市场主导的模式向公—私—社区三方合作模式转型，从物质性更新规划向综合的政
策体系设计转型的建议。
Abstract: This paper starts with an introduction to the evolution of urban renewal of UK since 1960s, and analyzes the background, policy framework,
implementation mechanism, and performance of urban renewal policies such as City Challenge, Single Regeneration Budget, and New Deal for
Communities which have been adopted since 1990s, and it concludes with policy implications for urban renewal in China, including transitions
from property-led renewal to comprehensive regeneration, from government-led or market-led urban renewal to public-private-community threeway
partnership-oriented urban regeneration, and from physical renewal planning to integrated policy design.
关键词：城市更新、实施政策、英国
Keyword: Urban renewal，Implementation policy，UK
中图分类号：TU981
文献标识码: A
资金资助
国家自然科学基金委项目 “城乡规划与设计” 51222813
[1]张更立. 走向三方合作的伙伴关系：西方城市更
新政策的演变及其对中国的启示[J]. 城市发展研
究，2004，11（4）：26-32.
ZHANG Gengli. Towards three-way partnership
in urban regeneration: the western experience
and implications to Chinese cities[J]. Urban
Development Studies, 2004(4): 26-32.
[2]张汉，宋林飞. 英美城市更新之国内学者研究综
述[J]. 城市问题，2008，2（1）：78-85.
ZHANG Han, SONG Linfei. Review on the
domestic studies on urban renewal in British and
American cities[J]. Urban Problems, 2008, 2(1):
78-85.
[3]杨静. 英美城市更新的主要经验及其启示[J]. 中
国房地信息，2004，（11）：63-65.
YANG Jing. The major experiences of urban
renewal in British and American cities and the
implications[J]. Real Estate Information of China,
2004, （11）: 63-65.
[4]阳建强. 西欧城市更新[M]. 南京：东南大学出版
社，2012.YANG Jianqiang. Urban renewal in western
Europe[M]. Nanjing: Southeast University
Press,2012.
[5]Taussik J, Smalley J. Partnerships in the 1990s:
Derby's successful City Challenge Bid[J]. Planning
Practice & Research, 1998, 13(3): 283-297.
[6]曲凌雁. 更新、再生与复兴——英国1960年代以
来城市政策方向变迁[J]. 国际城市规划，2011，
26（1）：59-65.
QU Lingyan.Renewa l , r egeneration and
renaissance: urban policies of Britain since the
1960s[J].Urban Planning International, 2011,
26(1): 59-65.
[7]Ball M, Maginn P. Urban change and conflict:
evaluating the role of partnerships in urban
regeneration in the UK[J]. Housing Studies, 2005,
20(1): 9-28.
[8]Dargan L. Participation and local urban
regeneration: the case of the New Deal for
Communities (NDC) in the UK[J]. Regional
Studies, 2009, 43(2): 305-317.
[9]Oc T,Tiesdell S. Supporting ethnic minority
business: areview of business support for ethnic
minorities in City Challenge areas[J]. Urban
Studies, 1999, 36(10): 1723-1746.
[10]Fearnley R. Regenerating the inner city: lessons
from the UK’s City Challenge experience[J].
Social Policy & Administration, 2000, 34(5): 567-
583.
[11]Hall S. The way forward for regeneration:lessons
from the single Regeneration Budget Challenge
Fund[J]. Local Government Studies, 2000, 21(1):
1-14.
[12]Davoudi S. City Challenge: the three-way
partnership[J]. Planning Practice & Research,
1995, 10(3): 333-344.
[13]Brennan A, Rhodes J,Tyler P. The distribution
of SRB Challenge Fund expenditure in relation
to local-area need in England[J]. Urban Studies,
1999, 36(12): 2069-2084.
[14]Rhodes J, Tyler P,Brennan A. New developments in
area-based initiatives in England: the experience of
the Single Regeneration Budget[J]. Urban Studies,2003, 40(8): 1399-1426.
[15]DETR (Department for the Environment, Transport
and the Regions). Bidding guidance: a guide to
funding from the Single Regeneration Budget[R].
London: Department of the Environment, 1994.
[16]Foley P, Hutchinson J,Fordham G. Managing the
challenge: winning and implementing the Single
Regeneration Budget Challenge Fund[J]. Planning
Practice & Research, 1998, 13(1): 63-80.
[17]Hall S,Nevin B. Continuity and change: areview
of English regeneration policy in the 1990s[J].
Regional Studies, 1999, 33(5): 477-482.
[18]Lawless P. Area-based urban interventions:
rationale and outcomes: the New Deal for
Communities Program in England[J]. Urban
Studies, 2006, 43(11): 1991-2011.
[19]CRESR (Centre for Regional Economic and Social
Research of Sheffield Hallam University). The
New Deal for Communities experience: afinal
assessment[R]. London: CRESR, Sheffield Hallam
University, 2010.
[20]田莉，姚之浩，郭旭，等. 基于产权重构的土地再
开发——新型城镇化背景下的地方实践与启示
[J]. 城市规划，2015（1）：22-29.
TIAN Li, YAO Zhihao, GUO Xu, et al. Land
redevelopment based on Property Right
Configuration: local practice and implications in
the context of new urbanization[J]. City Planning
Review, 2015 (1): 22-29.
[21]黄晓燕，曹小曙. 转型期城市更新中土地再开发
的模式与机制研究[J]. 城市观察，2011（2）：
15-22.
HUANG Xiaoyan, CAO Xiaoshu. Mode and
mechanism of land redevelopment in urban
regeneration during China’s Transitional
Period[J]. Urban Insight, 2011(2): 15-22.
[22]赵若焱. 对深圳城市更新“协商机制”的思考[J].
城市发展研究，2013，20（8）：118-121.
ZHAO Ruoyan. Thought over negotiation
mechanism of urban renewal in Shenzhen[J].
Urban Development Studies, 2013, 20(8):118-121.
