住区模式类型与居民交通出行碳排放相关性研究* ——以上海曹杨新村为例

Correlation Studies on Residential Pattern and Carbon Emissions from Residents Transportation: A Case Study of Caoyang Xincun in Shanghai

王伟强
同济大学建筑与城市规划学院 教授,博士生导师 同济大学建筑与城市空间研究所 副所长

摘要: 住区空间形态及模式类型与密度相关,居民交通出行碳排放与密度、设施多样性、交通站点可达性有着逻辑关联性。以上海曹杨新村作为实证对象加以模式类型划分,结合调研问卷数据将模式类型与碳排放进行相关性研究。分析结果显示,曹杨新村密度与人均交通碳排放间呈非线性波动变化,设施多样性与碳排放呈正相关性,交通站点可达性与碳排放基本呈负相关性。还发现多层围合式及小高层行列式的人均碳排异于其他模式类型,进一步对其居民职业构成、家庭年收入比较研究,碳排放差异性是由于社会结构的消费区隔化造成的。因此,判断住区模式是否“低碳”,首先当明确密度的空间与社会双重含义,并结合本国国情、地区发展条件来引导未来住区发展模式。

Abstract: Because population density is relevant to the residential pattern characteristics and pattern classification, the carbon emission from residential transportation is logically correlated with the population density, the diversity of facilities, and the accessibility of traffic sites. This paper takes Shanghai Caoyang Xincun as the object. We study the correlation between the residential patterns and carbon emissions with the data of the questionnaire data in the 8 residential patterns. The results show that the population density of Caoyang Xincun and the per capita carbon emissions of carbon emissions are nonlinear fluctuations, the diversity of facilities and carbon emissions are positively correlated, and the traffic site can reach a negative correlation with carbon emissions. It is also found that the per capita carbon emissions in the residential patterns of multi-storied enclosure dwellings and medium height row houses are different from other patterns. With the further study in professional structure and family income, it is concluded that the carbon emissions difference is caused by consumer segregation of social structure. Therefore, Before the judgment of low-carbon estate pattern, the structural characteristics of spatial density and society should be clarified first, then the national conditions, regional development condition; socioeconomic factors need to be combined to guide the development of future residential pattern.

关键词: 住区模式、交通碳排放、3Ds理论、曹杨新村

Keyword: Residential pattern,Traffic carbon emission,3Ds theory,Caoyang Xincun

中图分类号:中图分类号TU981

文献标识码: 文献标识码A

[1]Claessens M A. Dead end in 30 years[J]. RTD Info, Magzine on European Research, 2008, 39: 30-34.
[2]Fan J L, Liao H, Liang Q M, et al. Residential carbon emission evolutions in urban rural divided China: An end-use and behavior analysis[J]. Apply Energy, 2013, 101: 323-332.
[3]马静,柴彦威,刘志林. 基于居民出行行为的北京市交通碳排放影响机理[J]. 地理学报,2011,66(8):1023-1032.
MA Jing, CHAI Yanwei, LIU Zhilin. Traffic carbon emissions influence mechanism research of Beijing, Based on the residents travel behavior [J]. Acta Geographia Sinica, 2011, 66(8): 1023-1032.
[4]郑思齐,霍赕.低碳城市空间结构:从私家车出行角度的研究[J].World Economic Papers,2010(6):50-65.
ZHENG Siqi, HUO Dan.Low carbon urban spatial structure: research from the view of private cars use [J].World Economic Papers, 2010(6): 50-65.
[5]Susan H. Methodologies for exploring the link between urban form and travel behavior [J]. Transportation Research: Transport and Environment, 1996, 2 (2): 151-65.
[6]Bourne L S. Urban spatial structure: An introductory essay on concepts and criteria[M]. New York: Oxford University Press, 1982.
[7]Anderson P W, Kanaroglou P S, Miller E J. Urban forms, energy and the environment: Review of issues, evidence and policy[J]. Urban Studies, 1996, 33 (1): 7-35.
[8]Wahlgren I. Eco efficiency of urban form and transportation, proceedings of the ECEEE 2007 summer study, Panel 8 (Transport and Mobility)[R]. The European Council for an Energy Efficient Economy, 2007.
[9]Kennedy C, Steinberger J, Gasson B, et al. Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Global Cities[J]. Transportation Research Record, 1997, 1607: 105-115.
[10]Grazi F, Jeroen C J M. An empirical analysis of urban form transport and global warming[J]. Energy Journal, 2008, 29 (4): 97-122.
[11]Hoornweg D, Freire M, Lee M J, et.al. Cities and climate change: Responding to an urgent agenda[M]. Washington D.C.: World Bank, 2010.
[12]Cervero R, Kockelman K. Travel demand and the 3Ds: Density, diversity and design[J]. Transportation Research, 1997, 39: 30-34.
[13]C?亚历山大.建筑模式语言[M].王听度,周序鸿译.北京:北京知识产权出版社,2002.
Alexander C. A Pattern Language[M]. WANG Tingdu, ZHOU Xuhong, translation. Beijing : Beijing Intellectual Property Press, 2002.
[14]邓卫.突破居住区规划的小区单一模式[J]. 城市规划,2001,1(2):30-32.
DENG Wei. Breaking through the single pattern of Residential district planning[J]. Urban Planning, 2001, 1(2): 30-32.
[15]徐苗,杨震.起源与本质:空间政治经济学视角下的封闭住区.城市规划学刊[J].2010,(4):36-41
XU Miao, YANG Zhen. Origin and nature: enclosed residential space under the perspective of Political Economy[J]. Urban Planning Forum, 2010(4):36-41.

微信扫一扫
关注“上海城市规划”
公众号