发展权移转制度应用于文化资产保护之反思 ——台北经验个案研究

Rethinking the Transfer of Development Rights Mechanism in Cultural Heritage Asset Conservation:A Case Study of Taipei's Experience

徐伯瑞 ［台湾］
徐伯瑞建筑师事务所 主持建筑师，博士

摘要: 20世纪末，台湾地区为了推动历史建筑保护，实施发展权移转制度。此制度实施迄今，可观察到对历史建筑保护帮助极大，但也衍生部分课题。故以台北的经验个案为例，经由资料汇整与分析，探讨发展权移转制度应用于历史建筑保存的成败得失，以兹借镜。研究发现，发展权移转制度于台湾地区最初系由民间非政府组织与学者专家推动，用以缓和私有文化资产物业主抗拒历史保护造成的冲突，嗣后逐渐制度化于大范围的历史街区风貌保护，近期更成为政府与开发商协商的重要工具，如可进一步调整相关配套，对文化资产保护将更有帮助。

Abstract: At the end of the last century, for the purpose of promoting cultural-heritage-asset conservation, Taiwan implemented a Transfer Development Right (TDR) mechanism. Since the implementation of the TDR system, we observed significant benefits it has for the conservation of historic architecture, as well as some resulting new challenges. This paper explores several key cases in the evolution of the use of the TDR mechanism to exemplify Taipei's experience in the implementation of a TDR system, and to discuss the success and failures of using such a system in cultural-heritage-asset conservation.The results of this study show that while the TDR mechanism was initially advocated only by non-governmental organizations and academic scholars as a means to mitigate conflicts and the resistance of cultural-heritage-asset property owners toward conservation efforts, it has since been institutionalized through its use in large-scale, historic-district-style conservation projects. In recent years, the TDR mechanism also has become an important negotiation tool in government and commercial developer joint-venture projects that involve cultural heritage assets. It is expected that the TDR can play an even larger role in cultural-heritage-asset conservation with additional adjuvant management plans.

关键词：发展权移转，文化资产保护，都市再生

Keyword: Transfer of development rights、Cultural heritage conservation、Urban regeneration

中图分类号：TU981

文献标识码: A

[1]涂平子. 容积移转与都市质量：纽约市古迹保存与扩大使用发展权移转办法争议[J]. 城市与设计学报(7/8)，1999（7/8).
Too Patrick Ping-tze. Transfer of development rights and urban environmental quality: New York city experience [J]. Cities and Design, 1999 (7/8).
[2]夏铸九. 古迹保存意义的建构与重构[C]//第五次古迹修护技术研讨会专辑.台北：文化建设委员会，1993.
Hsia Chu-Joe. The constitution and reconstitution of the discourse of historic preservation[C]//The fifth symposium on restoration techniques for historical sites. Taipei: Council for Cultural Affairs, 1993.
[3]林柏年.美国容积移转制度经验谈——专访涂平子先生[J].空间杂志，1998（44）.
BO-Nan Lin. The experience of TDR in U.S.A：a interview of Too Patrick Ping-tze [J]. Space Magazine,1999 (44).
[4]台北县政府. 拟定芦洲都市计划（芦洲李宅古迹保存区）细部计划案[M]. 台北，2010.
Taipei county Government.Draw up and design of Lu-Jou urban plan (Lu-Jou Lee family’s house monument preservation) detail-plan specification[M].Taipei,2010
[5]历史资源经营管理学会.拟修订大稻埕历史风貌特定区都市计划案[R]. 台北，2006.
Institute of Historical Resources Management Taiwan. Research of rezoning Da-Dao-Chen historical special district plan[R]. Taipei，2006.
[6]林崇杰. 台湾运用容积移转于历史保存之政策与实践之检讨[J]. 文资学报，2008（4）.
LIN Chung-Chieh. The policy and practice of transfer of development rights for the historic preservation in Taiwan[J].Journal of Culture Resources, 2008 (4).
[7]台北市政府都市发展局. 台北市都市计划年报2014[R].台北，2014.
Urban Development Bureau Taipei Municipal Government. The annual report of Taipei urban development 2014 [R].Taipei, 2014.