信息运用与城市规划管理创新
Information Applications and Innovations in Urban Planning and Management
杨宏山
中国人民大学公共管理学院 教授，博士生导师
摘要: 城市规划管理是决策者恰当运用专家知识和公众偏好，提高决策理性和公信力的过程。由于规划决策不仅涉及技术与事实问题，还与公众的价值偏好密切相关，因此必须建立起专家参与和公众参与的互动交流机制。信息技术的快速发展为组织公众参与创造了条件，但无论是数字城市建设、还是大数据开发，现有的信息技术运用均不同程度忽视了公众的价值诉求，而更多成为政府管理或数据挖掘的工具。当前智慧城市的发展方向则是以信息技术为手段，建构专家和公众共同参与的互动平台，使得专家知识和公众偏好都能在规划决策中得以识别和运用。
Abstract: Urban planning and management is a process to elevate rational decision making and credibility via using expert knowledge and public preference. Because the decision making is not only related to technological problem but also involved in public value, communication mechanism between expert and public must be set up. The rapid development of information technology provides the condition for public participation. However, both the construction of digital city and big data model have neglected public preference, and technology has become a mere tool for public administration and data mining. In order to promote the combination of professional knowledge and public preference, the future direction is to construct a platform for interaction between experts and public participation via information technological application.
关键词：信息运用、城市规划管理、专家知识、公众参与
Keyword: Information application, Urban planning and management, Expert knowledge, Public participation
中图分类号：TU981
文献标识码: A
[1] 王怀成. 德累斯顿易北河谷被《世界文化遗产名录》除名[N]. 光明日报，2009-06-29.
WANG Huaicheng. Dresden Elbe Valley was dismissed from World Heritage List [N]. Guang Ming Daily, 2009-06-29.
[2] 马莉. 德累斯顿易北河谷被除名的启示[J]. 中华建设，2009（9）：46-47.
MA Li. The Reflection on the Removal of Dresden Elbe Valley[J]. China Construction, 2009(9):46-47.
[3] 燕海鸣. 首个被世遗名单清除的文化遗产[N]. 中国青年报，2012-07-27.
YAN Haiming. The First Case of Removal from World Cultural Heritage[N]. China Youth Daily, 2012-07-27.
[4]赫伯特 A 西蒙. 管理行为[M]. 北京：机械工业出版社，2013:6.
Herbert A. Simon. Administrative Behavior [M]. Beijing: China Machine Press, 2013:6.
[5] Bessette J M. Deliberative Democracy: The Majority Principle in Republic Government. In Glodwin R A. and Schambra W A. eds. How Democratic Is the Constitution? [M]. Washington: American Enterprise Institute, 1980:102-116.
[6] Dryzek J S. Deliberative Democracy and Beyond: Liberals, Critics, Contestations[M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.
[7] 杨宏山. 数字化城市管理的制度分析[J]. 城市发展研究，2009（1）：109-113.
YANG Hongshan. Institutional Analysis on Digital Urban Management [J]. Urban Development Studies, 2009(1):109-113.
[8] 叶裕民，皮定均，等. 数字化城市管理导论[M]. 北京:中国人民大学出版社，2009.
YE Yumin, PI Dingjun,et al. Introduction of Digital Urban Management [M]. Beijing: Renmin University of China Press, 2009.
[9] 龙瀛，吴康，王江浩，等. 大模型：城市和区域研究的新进展[J]. 城市规划学刊， 2014（6）：52-60.
LONG Ying, WU Kang, WANG Jianghao, et al. Big Models: A Novel Paradigm for Urban and Regional Studies[J]. Urban Planning Forum, 2014(6):52-60.
[10]凯西•卡麦兹. 建构扎根理：质性研究实践指南[M]. 边国英，译. 重庆：重庆大学出版社，2009.
Charmaz K. Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide through Qualitative Analysis [M]. BIAN Guoying, translate. Chongqing: Chongqing University Press, 2009.
