政府引导下城中村公共产品内生性供给模式的研究——以东莞Y村为例
A Government-led Endogenous Supply Model of Public Goods in Urban Villages: A Case Study of Y Village in Dongguan
郝云庆
东莞市城建规划设计院 城市更新研究中心副主任，城乡规划高级工程师硕士
石建业（通信作者）
东莞市城建规划设计院 城市更新研究中心主任，城乡规划高级工程师硕士，349584754@qq.com
刘怀宽
东莞市城建规划设计院城乡规划高级工程师，博士
刘俊宇
东莞市城建规划设计院规划师，硕士
摘要: 政府、市场、社会是城中村公共产品的主要供给主体。受多中心治理模式的影响，学界提出政府、市场、村集体、外来人口共同参与的多主体供给模式，但是主体间如何相互作用，能够实现公共产品供给运营的效益最大化，还需要更多的探讨和思考。对东莞城中村——Y村的研究，提出一种政府引导下村集体“内生性”供给模式：（1）政府通过规划引导、社会需求调查，按需供给公共产品，保证公共产品供给的合理性、科学性，供给的产品类型、规模符合需求（。2）村集体将部分集体收益投资建设公共产品、改善建成环境，实现村集体物业的保值增值、公共产品“投资—收益—再投资” 的正向循环（。3）当地村民和居民能够享用到更符合需求、满意度较高的公共产品，实现公共产品规划建设合理、使用者满意、集体资产良性运转的多方共赢。
Abstract: Urban villages are "isolated islands" of social-spatial governance in rapidly urbanized areas, with common problems such as insufficient supply and low-quality public goods. The existing theory of polycentric governance proposes the participation of multiple supply entities, but what kind of interaction and strength of influence among multiple entities could maximize the efficiency of public goods remains uncertain. This article proposes a "government-led and village-dominated" supply model through studying the Village Y in Dongguan: (1) the local government strengthens the rationality of public-good distribution through government-led comprehensive planning and provides the most-needed public goods through questionnaire survey on local residents; (2) the local village could experience a positive "investment-revenue-reinvestment" cycle, because the village benefits more on their property (e.g., rental) due to the better built environment; (3) the local villagers and residents enjoy public products with higher satisfaction, achieving a win-win effect on governments, villages and local residents.
关键词：公共产品；多中心治理；政府引导；内生性供给；城中村
Keyword: public goods; polycentric governance; government guidance; endogenous supply; urban village
中图分类号：TU984
文献标识码: A
叶裕民. 特大城市包容性城中村改造理论架构
与机制创新——来自北京和广州的考察与思考
[J]. 城市规划，2015（8）：9-23.
YE Yumin. Theoretical framework and mechanism
innovation of the inclusive urban village reconstruc-
tion in Chinese megacities: study and reflections on
Beijing and Guangzhou[J]. City Planning Review, 2015(8): 9-23.
石欣欣，胡纹，孙远赫. 可持续的乡村建设与村
庄公共品供给——困境、原因与制度优化[J]. 城
市规划，2021（10）：45-58.
SHI Xinxin, HU Wen, SUN Yuanhe. Sustainable rural construction and public goods provision: predicaments, causes, and institutional
optimization[J]. City Planning Review, 2021(10): 45-58.
张理政，叶裕民. 城中村更新治理40年：学术思
想的演进与展望[J]. 城市规划，2022（5）：103-
114.
ZHANG Lizheng, YE Yumin. Forty years of urban
village redevelopment and governance: evolution
and prospect of academic thoughts[J]. City Planning Review, 2022(5): 103-114.
陈江畅，邱和阳. 基于公共产品理论的城市更新
方法研究：兼论“旧城更新”中“集体行动困境”
的破解之道[C]//人民城市，规划赋能——2023
中国城市规划年会论文集. 北京：中国建筑工业
出版社，2023：10.
CHEN Jiangchang, QIU Heyang. Research on urban renewal methods based on the theory of
public goods: the solution to the "collective action
dilemma" in the "old city renewal"[C]//People's
city, planning empowerment - proceedings of the 2023 National Annual Planning Conference. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press, 2023: 10.
SAMUELSON P A. Diagrammatic exposition of a theory of public expenditure[J]. Review of Economics & Statistics, 1955, 37(4):350-356.
MUSGRAVE R A. The theory of public finance: a
study in public economics[J]. Journal of Political Economy, 1959, 49(5):1018-1029.
HARDIN G. The tragedy of the commons[J]. Science, 1969, 162(5364): 1243-1248.
孙莹，张尚武. 乡村建设的治理机制及其建设效
应研究——基于浙江奉化四个乡村建设案例的
比较[J]. 城市规划学刊，2021（1）：44-51.
SUN Ying, ZHANG Shangwu. A research on village governance mechanism and construction
performance: based on four village cases in Fenghua, Zhejiang[J]. Urban Planning Forum, 2021(1): 44-51.
申明锐，张京祥. 政府主导型乡村建设中的公共
产品供给问题与可持续乡村治理[J]. 国际城市
规划，2019（1）：1-7.
SHEN Mingrui, ZHANG Jingxiang. Toward a sustainable rural governance the public goods provision in question amidst the state-led rural con-
struction in China[J]. Urban Planning International,
2019(1): 1-7.
刘迪. 老旧小区更新协作困境的理论原型与破
解机制——基于公共选择理论的分析框架[J].
城市规划，2022，46（12）：57-66.
LIU Di. Research on theoretical prototype and solution of the cooperation dilemma in old community
regeneration: analysis framework based on public
choice theory[J]. City Planning Review, 2022, 46(12):
57-66.
何斌，刘奕，方煜. 深圳公共产品导向型城市更
新探索——以深圳罗湖口岸片区为例[J]. 城市
观察，2021（5）：52-59.
HE Bin, LIU Yi, FANG Yu. Exploration of Shenzhen's public products-oriented urban renewal: a case study of Luohu Port Area in Shenzhen[J]. Urban Insight, 2021(5): 52-59.
田莉，陶然，梁印龙. 城市更新困局下的实施模
式转型：基于空间治理的视角[J]. 城市规划学
刊，2020（3）：41-47.
TIAN Li, TAO Ran, LIANG Yinlong. Transition of implementation pattern in the predicament
of urban renewal: a perspective of spatial
governance[J]. Urban Planning Forum, 2020(3): 41-47.
万成伟，于洋. 公共产品导向:多中心治理的城中
村更新——以深圳水围柠盟人才公寓为例[J].
国际城市规划，2021，36（5）：138-147.
WAN Chengwei, YU Yang. Public product orientation: urban village renewal under polycentric
governance, a case study of Ningmeng Talent Apartment in Shuiwei Village, Shenzhen[J]. Urban
Planning International, 2021, 36(5): 138-147.
罗春伟，王荻. 城中村经济发展与社会治理对策
研究——基于厦门市翔安区十个典型城中村的
调查[J]. 城市建筑，2023（10）：208-211.
LUO Chunwei, WANG Di. Exploration on the economic development and social governance countermeasures of urban villages: based on the survey on ten typical urban villages in Xiang'an
District, Xiamen[J]. Urbanism and Architecture, 2023(10): 208-211.
OSTROM E. Understanding institutional diversity[M]. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2009.
刘红，张洪雨，王娟. 多中心治理理论视角下的
村改居社区治理研究[J]. 理论与改革，2018（5）：
153-162.
LIU Hong, ZHANG Hongyu, WANG Juan. Study on governance of village-to-community
community from the perspective of multi-center
governance theory[J]. Theory and Reform, 2018(5): 153-162.
逯百慧，王红扬，冯建喜. 哈维“资本三级循环”
理论视角下的大都市近郊区乡村转型——以南
京市江宁区为例[J]. 城市发展研究，2015（12）：
43-50.
LU Baihui, WANG Hongyang, FENG Jianxi. The rural transformation in suburban area in the view of Capital Circuit Theory of Harvey: a case study of Jiangning District of Nanjing[J]. Urban Development Studies, 2015(12): 43-50.
渠敬东. 项目制：一种新的国家治理体制[J]. 中
国社会科学，2012（5）：113-130.
QU Jingdong. The project system: a new form of state governance[J]. Social Sciences in China, 2012(5): 113-130.
