长三角地区城市空间绩效与系统协调性演变研究
Study on the Evolution of Urban Spatial Performance and System Coordination in Yangtze River Delta Region
潘 鑫
上海同济城市规划设计研究院有限公司创研中心 自然资源部国土空间智能规划技术重点实验室 高级工程师
张尚武（通信作者）
同济大学建筑与城市规划学院 教授 自然资源部国土空间智能规划技术重点实验室 主任 上海同济城市规划设计研究院有限公司 院长
沈逸菲
同济大学建筑与城市规划学院 硕士研究生
摘要: 城市空间绩效评价能够揭示城市空间发展的效率和均衡性问题，为城市空间发展预警，提高政府制定城市发展战略的
能力。在阐释城市空间绩效内涵的基础上，从“经济—社会—环境”视角构建空间绩效评价体系，运用熵值法—层次分
析复合模型、耦合协调度模型等，对长三角地区26个中心城市的空间绩效与系统协调性演变特征进行系统研究。结果表
明：（1）城市空间综合绩效处于加速提升阶段，3大子系统内部结构存在明显演变，综合绩效正从效率优先向社会服务
均衡优先转变。（2）城市空间“经济—社会—环境”系统协调度总体程度仍然较低，但两两耦合协调水平发现3大系统
均处于正向协调优化阶段，且“经济—社会”协调度演进速度较高。（3）城市空间绩效系统协调性基本遵循从低度协调
到中度协调的演化路径，各类问题城市存在空间集聚的态势。
Abstract: Urban spatial performance evaluation can reveal the efficiency and balance of urban development, provide early warning for
urban spatial development, and improve the government's ability to formulate urban development strategies. On the basis of
elucidating the connotation of urban spatial performance, the paper constructs a spatial performance evaluation system from
the perspective of "economy - society - environment", and uses the entropy method - analytic hierarchy process composite model and coupling coordination degree model to systematically study the spatial performance and system coordination
evolution characteristics of 26 central cities in the Yangtze River Delta region. The results show that: (1) The comprehensive
performance of urban space is in the stage of accelerating improvement. The internal structure of the three subsystems has obviously evolved, and the comprehensive performance is changing from efficiency priority to social service balance priority.
(2) The overall degree of coordination of the economic performance, social performance and environmental performance of urban space is still low, but the level of coupling and coordination of the two shows that the three subsystems are in the
positive coordination and optimization stage, and the evolution speed of the coordination of economic performance and social
performance is high. (3) The coordination of urban spatial performance system basically follows the evolutionary path from
low coordination to medium coordination, and all kinds of problem cities have the trend of spatial agglomeration.
关键词：长三角地区；城市空间绩效；绩效评价；系统协调性
Keyword: Yangtze River Delta region; urban spatial performance; performance evaluation; system coordination
中图分类号：TU984
文献标识码: A
资金资助
国家 “十四五”国家重点研发计划项目 2022YFC3800800
国家 国家自然科学基金项目 52078352
上海 上海同济城市规划设计研究院有限公司暨长三角城市群智能规划协同创新中心科研课题 KY-2023-YB-B03
张文忠，许婧雪，马仁锋，等. 中国城市高质量发展内涵、现状及发展导向——基于居民调查视角[J]. 城市规划，2019，43（11）：13-19.
ZHANG Wenzhong, XU Jingxue, MA Renfeng, et al. Basic connotation, current situation, and development orientation of high-quality
development of Chinese cities: based on the survey of residents[J]. City Planning Review, 2019, 43(11):13-19.
梁志霞，毕胜. 基于城市功能的城市发展质量及其影响因素研究——以京津冀城市群为例[J].经济问题，2020（1）：103-111.
LIANG Zhixia, BI Sheng. Study on the quality of urban development and its influencing factors based on urban function: take Beijing - Tianjin - Hebei urban agglomeration as an example[J]. On Economic Problems, 2020(1): 103-111.
沈玲媛，邓宏兵. 武汉城市圈和长株潭城市群城市发展质量比较研究[J]. 地域研究与开发，2008（6）：7-10.
SHEN Lingyuan, DENG Hongbing. Comparative research on urban development quality of Wuhan and Chang - Zhu - Tan urban clusters[J]. Areal Research and Development, 2008(6): 7-10.
潘鑫，张尚武. 长三角地区城市空间扩展时空格局与特征研究[J]. 上海城市管理，2023，32（3）：75-84.
PAN Xin, ZHANG Shangwu. Spatial-temporal pattern and characteristics of urban spatial expansion in the Yangtze River Delta[J]. Shanghai Urban Management, 2023, 32(3): 75-84.
ARMSTRONG M, BARON A. Performance management[M]. London: The Cromwell Press, 1998.
吴一洲，吴次芳，罗文斌，等. 浙江省城市土地利用绩效的空间格局及其机理研究[J]. 中国土地科学，2009，23（10）：41-46.
WU Yizhou, WU Cifang, LUO Wenbin, et al. Research on the performance of urban land use in terms of spatial pattern and mechanism in Zhejiang Province[J]. China Land Science, 2009, 23(10): 41-46.
潘鑫. 基于绩效的公共服务设施规划实施评估方法研究——以济南市为例[J]. 上海城市规划，2020（6）：99-104.
PAN Xin. Research on performance-based evaluation method of public service facility planning implementation: a case study of Ji'nan[J]. Shanghai Urban Planning Review, 2020(6): 99-104.
WILLIAMS R. Performance management[M]. London: International Thomson Business Press, 1998.
王坤，黄震方，曹芳东，等. 泛长江三角洲城市旅游绩效空间格局演变及其影响因素[J]. 自然资源学报，2016，31（7）：1149-1162.
WANG Kun, HUANG Zhenfang, CAO Fangdong,et al. Spatial pattern evolution of urban tourism performance and its influence factors in Pan-Yangtze River Delta[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2016, 31(7): 1149-1162.
柴季. 城市土地利用绩效评价及提升机制研究——以武汉市为例[D]. 北京：中国地质大学，2018.
CHAI Ji. Research on evaluation and promotion mechanism of performance of urban land use:a case study of Wuhan City[D]. Beijing: China University of Geosciences, 2018.
张玉茜，姜仁荣，杜茎深. 面向新型城镇化的城市国土空间利用质量评析——城市国土空间利用质量内涵初探[J]. 中国国土资源经济，2016
（9）：61-64.
ZHANG Yuqian, JIANG Renrong, DU Jingshen. Quality assessment of new-type urbanization oriented urban land and space use - discussion on the connotation of the quality of urban land and space use[J]. Natural Resource Economics of China,2016(9): 61-64.
DANZIG S M. What we need to know about performance appraisals[J]. Management Review, 1980, 69(2): 20-24.
彭坤焘，赵民．关于“城市空间绩效”及城市规划的作为[J]. 城市规划，2010（8）：9-17.
PENG Kuntao, ZHAO Min. Urban spatial performance and urban planning efficiency[J]. City Planning Review, 2010(8): 9-17.
马静，李小帆，张红. 长江中游城市群城市发展质量系统协调性研究[J]. 经济地理，2016，36（7）：53-61.
MA Jing, LI Xiaofan, ZHANG Hong. The coordination of urban development quality system in urban agglomeration in the middle reaches of the Yangtze River[J]. Economic Geography, 2016,36(7): 53-61.
刘志彪. 理解高质量发展：基本特征，支撑要素与当前重点问题[J]. 学术月刊，2018（7）：39-45.
LIU Zhibiao. Understanding the high-quality development: basic features, supporting elements and current key-issues[J]. Academic Monthly, 2018(7): 39-45.
LEE B. 'Edge' or 'Edgeless Cities'? Urban spatial structure in US metropolitan areas, 1980 to 2000[J]. Journal of Regional Science, 2007, 47(3):479-515.
LI W, SUN B, ZHAO J, et al. Economic performance of spatial structure in Chinese prefecture regions: evidence from night-time
satellite imagery[J]. Habitat International, 2018, 76: 29-39.
贾玉秋，唐立娜. 中国城市空间形态的环境效应[J]. 生态学报，2019，39（8）：2986-2994.
IA Yuqiu, TANG Li'na. Environmental effects of the urban spatial form of Chinese cities[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2019, 39(8): 2986-2994.
YIN C Y, SHAO C F, DONG C J, et al. Happiness in urbanizing China: the role of commuting and multi-scale built environment across urban regions[J]. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 2019, 74: 306-317.
BORREGO C, MAINS H, TCNEPEL O, et al. How urban structure can affect city sustainability from an air quality perspective[J]. Environmental Modelling & Software, 2006, 21(4): 461-467.
TAO Y, ZHANG Z, OU W, et al. How does urban form influence PM2.5 concentrations: insights from 350 different-sized cities in the rapidly urbanizing Yangtze River Delta region of China, 1998–2015[J]. Cities, 2020, 98: 102581.
孙斌栋，涂婷，石巍，等. 特大城市多中心空间结构的交通绩效检验——上海案例研究[J]. 城市规划学刊，2013（2）：63-69.
SUN Bindong, TU Ting, SHI Wei, et al. Test on performance of polycentric spatial structure as a measure of congestion reduction in megacities: the case study on Shanghai[J]. Urban Planning Forum,2013(2): 63-69.
余瑞林. 武汉城市空间生产的过程、绩效与机制分析[D]. 湖北：华中师范大学，2013.
YU Ruilin. The evolution, performance and mechanism of the production of urban space in Wuhan[D]. Hubei: Central China Normal University, 2013.
李兰. 基于主体价值的城市空间扩展绩效研究—以陕西省榆林市为例[D]. 西安：西安建筑科技大学，2014.
LI Lan. A research of the urban spatial extension performance based on the subject value scale -take Yulin in Shaanxi Province as an example[D].Xi'an: Xi'an University of Architecture and Technology, 2014.
崔许锋，张光宏. 城镇用地“经济—社会—生态”绩效空间分异与障碍诊断[J]. 人文地理，2016，31（1）：94-101.
CUI Xufeng, ZHANG Guanghong. Spatial differentiation and hindrance diagnosis of urban land use economic-social-ecological performance[J]. Human Geography, 2016, 31(1): 94-101.
周文娜. 基于战略数据平台的上海城市空间质量指数（SQI）探索[J]. 上海城市规划，2014（5）：30-34.
ZHOU Wenna. Study of Shanghai spatial development quality index on the strategy database platform[J]. Shanghai Urban Planning Review, 2014(5): 30-34.
魏宏森，王伟. 广义系统论的基本原理[J]. 系统辩证学学报，1993（1）：52-58.
WEI Hongsen, WANG Wei. The basic principles of general system theory[J]. Chinese Journal of Systems Science, 1993(1): 52-58.
李帅，魏虹，倪细炉，等. 基于层次分析法和熵权法的宁夏城市人居环境质量评价[J]. 应用生态学报，2014，25（9）：2700-2708.
LI Shuai, WEI Hong, NI Xilu, et al. Evaluation of urban human settlement quality in Ningxia based on AHP and the entropy method[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2014, 25(9): 2700-2708.
王成，唐宁. 重庆市乡村三生空间功能耦合协调的时空特征与格局演化[J]. 地理研究，2018，37（6）：1100-1114.
WANG Cheng, TANG Ning. Spatio-temporal characteristics and evolution of rural productionliving-ecological space function coupling
coordination in Chongqing municipality[J]. Geographical Research, 2018, 37(6): 1100-1114.
杨忍，刘彦随，龙花楼. 中国环渤海地区人口—土地—产业非农化转型协同演化特征[J]. 地理研究，2015，34（3）：475-486.
YANG Ren, LIU Yansui, LONG Hualou. The study on non-agricultural transformation co-evolution characteristics of "population-landindustry":case study of the Bohai Rim in China[J].Geographical Research, 2015, 34(3): 475-486.
李裕瑞，王婧，刘彦随，等. 中国“四化”协调发展的区域格局及其影响因素[J]. 地理学报，2014，69（2）：199-212.
LI Yurui, WANG Jing, LIU Yansui, et al. Spatial pattern and influencing factors of the coordination development of industrialization, informatization, urbanization and agricultural modernization in China: a prefecture level exploratory spatial data analysis[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2014, 69(2):199-212.
