城市的本质与规划的要义：新时代的元思考
The Nature of City and the Essence of Planning: The Meta-Thoughts of Chinese City Planning Research in New Era
刘贤腾
江西财经大学财税与公共管理学院 副教授，博士
张从果
浙江清华长三角研究院空间规划院 执行院长，博士
摘要: 国土空间规划体系的建立对城市规划学科定位提出新的要求，故需对城市规划学科进行元思考。直观认知上，城市是人们生
产生活的场所，而其实质则是人类展开大规模社会协作网络的载体，是人们根据生存繁衍需求而生产出来的主客体统一的
“第三空间”。规划是具有高级意识活动的人类规范种群自发自组织行为来趋利避害的行为，是根据群体共预期建立起来的秩
序。规划需以法治为基础，为实现群体共预期的秩序而施行干预行为；城市规划是为了回应城市问题而从空间角度提出的解
决方案和控制机制，是建构空间秩序的理性行动。新时代中国城市规划学科研究仍应固本守元，科学理性地编制城市规划成
果，以指导、规范和调整当前的土地开发使用活动，并主动减少因未来的不确定性而可能对高质量生产生活带来的冲击。
Abstract: With the creation of territory and spatial planning system in China, the ambiguity of urban planning's role in the new planning
system emerged. It is necessary to ponder the meta-thoughts of modern urban planning discipline in the new era of China. With
sensitive perception, the urban is looked at as the place for production and living, but the nature of city is the infra-carrier for
large-scale social cooperation networks. Urban which satisfies the need of living and survival of humankind is identified as "the
third space" which is characterized as the unity of objective and subjective, and as the unity of time and space. Planning is the
intended behavior. It aims to pursue safety and to avoid menace, and is engaged only by humankind. Planning can be viewed as
a tool to construct the common anticipation of social groups. Formulating the plans should be based on the reasons of scientific
knowledge. Implementing the plans needs the empowerment of government so as to interpose interests of subgroups, which
can see the brilliant ideas of human intelligence. In the new era of social and economic development in China, the development
of urban planning discipline should stick to the root of research and make plans rationally to regulate the new needs of urban
constructions, which can reduce the uncertainty of development in order to achieve the goodness of urban life.
关键词：城市本质；规划实质；中国城市规划研究；新时代
Keyword: the nature of city; the essence of planning; Chinese urban planning research; new era
中图分类号：TU981
文献标识码: A
资金资助
江西省 江西省社会科学“十四五”（2021年）课题 21YJ21D
刘小强. 学科建设：元视角的考察——关于高等教育学学科建设的反思[M]. 广州：广东教育出版社，2011.
LIU Xiaoqiang. Discipline construction: from meta-perspective—rethinking of the discipline construction of pedagogy of higher education[M].Guangzhou: Guangdong Higher Education Publish House, 2011.
孙施文. 解析中国城市规划[J]. 城乡规划，2017（1）：12-21.
SUN Shiwen. On urban planning system in China[J].Urban and Rural Planning, 2017(1): 12-21.
孙施文. 我国城乡规划学科未来发展方向研究[J]. 城市规划，2021，45（2）：23-35.
SUN Shiwen. Research on the development of urban and rural planning discipline in China[J]. Urban Planning Review, 2021, 45(2): 23-35.
纪晓岚. 试论认识城市本质定义的重要意义[J].现代城市研究，2003（2）：3-6.
JI Xiaolan. On the importance of understanding the essence definition of city[J]. Modern Urban Research, 2003(2): 3-6.
刘涛，王光宇. 城市的起源及本质[J]. 益阳：湖南城市学院学报，2006（6）：69-72.
LIU Tao, WANG Guangyu. City origin and its essence[J]. Journal of Hu'nan City University, 2006(6): 69-72.
宋俊岭. 城市的定义和本质[J]. 北京社会科学，1994（2）：108-114.
SONG Junling. The definition of city and its essence [J]. Social Science of Beijing, 1994(2):108-114.
高军波，张润朋. 基于城市本质认识的城市规划模式探讨[J]. 现代城市研究，2008（8）：6-12.
GAO Junbo, ZHANG Runpeng. On the mode of urban planning based on the understanding of the essence of city[J]. Modern Urban Research, 2008(8): 6-12.
黄璇，任剑涛. 城市演进与国家兴衰历程的现代启示[J]. 北京：中国人民大学学报，2014，28（1）：73-81.
HUANG Xuan, REN Jiantao. The evolution of the city and the rise and fall of the state: a modern apocalypse[J]. Journal of Renmin University of China, 2014, 28(1): 73-81.
季曦，刘民权. 以人类发展的视角看城市化的必然性[J]. 南京大学学报（哲学•人文科学•人社会科学版），2010，47（4）：46-53.
JI Xi, LIU Minquan. Inevitable urbanization in the perspective of human development[J]. Journal of Nanjing University (Philosophy, Humanities and Social Sciences), 2010, 47(4): 46-53.
陆扬. 析索亚“第三空间”理论[J]. 天津社会科学，2005（2）：32-37.
LU Yang. Exploring the "Third Space Theory" of Soja[J]. Social Science of Tianjin, 2005(2): 32-37.
亨利•列斐伏尔. 空间的生产[M]. 刘怀玉，等译.北京：商务印书馆，2021.
LEFEBVRE H. The production of space[M]. LIU Huaiyu, et al, translate. Beijing: The Commercial Press, 2021.
金经元. 城市特色的规律性和规划的能动性[J].城市规划，1990（5）：11-13.
JIN Jingyuan. The regularity of urban characteristics and the initiative of planning[J]. Urban Planning Review, 1990(5): 11-13.
薛立新. 城市的本质[J]. 城市规划，2016，40（7）：9-18.
XUE Lixin. The nature of city[J]. Urban Planning Review, 2016, 40(7): 9-18.
WILDAVSKY A，王韬. 如果规划什么都是，也许它什么都不是！ [J]. 住区，2011，41（1）：21-30.
WILDAVSKY A, WANG Tao. If planning is everything, maybe it's nothing![J]. Inhabitation,2011, 41(1): 21-30.
弗里德里希•A•哈耶克. 科学的反革命：理性滥用之研究[M]. 冯克利，译. 南京：译林出版社，2003.
HAYEK F A. The counter-revolution of science: studies on the abuse of reason[M]. FENG Keli, et al, translate. Nanjing: Yilin Press, 2003.
蒋万胜. 秩序、规则与预期[J]. 长安大学学报（社会科学版），2007，26（1）：70-74.
JIANG Wansheng. Order, rules and expectation[J].Journal of Chang'an University (Social Science Edition), 2007, 26(1): 70-74.
西塞罗. 理性、美德和灵魂的声音[M]. 王晓朝，译. 武汉：长江文艺出版社，2015.
CICERO M T. The voice of reason, virtue, and soul[M]. WANG Xiaochao, et al, translate. Wuhan: Changjiang Literature and Art Publishing House, 2015.
张庭伟. 应对挑战：城市规划的自我演化[J]. 城市规划学刊，2015（4）：8-11.
ZHANG Tingwei. The self-evolution of China's urban planning profession in a slow economy[J]. Urban Planning Forum, 2015(4): 8-11.
孙施文. 从城乡规划到国土空间规划[J]. 城市规划学刊，2020（4）：11-17.
SUN Shiwen. On the transformation from urban and rural planning to territorial space planning[J].Urban Planning Forum, 2020(4): 11-17.
孙施文. 规划的理性与理性的规划[C]//理性规划. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社，2017.
SUN Shiwen. Rationality in planning and rational planning[C]// Rational Planning. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press, 2017.
孙施文. 解析中国城市规划：规划院制度与中国城市规划发展探究[J]. 城市规划学刊，2018（4）：
10-15.
SUN Shiwen. An analysis on planning paradigms and the evolution of urban planning in China[J].Urban Planning Forum, 2018(4): 10-15.
