上海市双职工育儿家庭的时间压力与分工特征
Time Pressure and Division of Labor Characteristics of Dual-earner Families with Children in Shanghai
焦 健
西北大学城市与环境学院 讲师，博士
王 德（通信作者）
同济大学建筑与城市规划学院 教授，博士生导师 上海同济城市规划设计研究院有限公司 数字规划研究中心主任
程 英
国家统计局上海调查总队 副总队长，高级统计师
摘要: 双职工家庭在育儿阶段遭遇的多重时间压力，是我国城市居民家庭面临的主要困境之一，已引起社会的广泛关注与讨
论。然而，针对这一问题的实证研究仍十分匮乏。基于上海2018年时间利用调查数据，分析了双职工育儿夫妻的时间利用
特征，剖析了夫妻的时间压力类型及其日常活动特征，并探讨了不同时间压力类型的家庭分工方案。研究发现，双职工家
庭在育儿阶段遭遇家务照料与通勤时间增加的双重压力；识别出超高家庭压力型、家庭压力型、通勤压力型、一般压力型4
种时间压力类型等。以期揭示我国大城市典型家庭的生活困境，为家庭与育儿友好的政策制定提供研究基础与启示。
Abstract: Struggling with multiple time pressures during the child-rearing period is one of the major dilemmas faced by families in China and has aroused widespread concern and discussion in society. However, empirical studies on this issue remain scarce.
Based on Shanghai's 2018 Time Use Survey data, this study examines the time use patterns of dual-earner parenting couples
and analyzes the time pressure types of the couples and their daily activity patterns. The results show that dual-earner families
encounter the dual stress of domestic work and increased commuting time during the child-rearing period, and four types of
time pressure are identifiable: extremely high family pressure, family pressure, commuting pressure, and general pressure. This study aims to provide research bases for child-rearing-friendly policies.
关键词：育儿；时间利用；活动模式；家庭分工；双职工家庭
Keyword: child-rearing; time-use pattern; activity pattern; division of household labor; dual-earner family
中图分类号：TU984
文献标识码: A
资金资助
国家 国家自然科学基金项目 52378069
GIURGE L M, WHILLANS A V, WEST C. Why time poverty matters for individuals, organisations and nations[J]. Nature Human Behaviour, 2020, 4(10): 993-1003.
HARVEY A S, MUKHOPADHYAY A K. When twenty-four hours is not enough: time poverty of working parents[J]. Social Indicators Research, 2007, 82: 57-77.
KALENKOSKI C M, HAMRICK K S, ANDREWS M. Time poverty thresholds and rates for the US population[J]. Social Indicators Research, 2011, 104: 129-155.
CHATZITHEOCHARI S, ARBER S. Class, gender and time poverty: a time-use analysis of British workers' free time resources[J]. The British Journal of Sociology, 2012, 63(3): 451-471.
焦健，王德，程英. 上海市时间贫困人群的日常活动模式与特征[J]. 城市规划，2023，47（4）：31-44.
JIAO Jian, WANG De, CHENG Ying. Daily activity patterns and characteristics of the time-poverty people in Shanghai[J]. City Planning Review, 2023, 47(4): 31-44.
MIRANDA V. Cooking, caring, and volunteering:unpaid work around the world (OECD social, employment and migration working papers, No.116)[R/OL]. (2011-03-03) [2024-01-01]. https://www.oecd.org/berlin/47258230.pdf.
APPS P, REES R. Gender, time use, and public policy over the life cycle[J]. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 2005, 21(3): 439-461.
ANXO D, MENCARINI L, PAILHÉ A, et al. Gender differences in time use over the life course in France, Italy, Sweden, and the US[J]. Feminist Economics, 2011, 17(3): 159-195.
许琪. 时间都去哪儿了?——从生命历程的角度看中国男女时间利用方式的差异[J]. 妇女研究论丛，2018（4）：19-32.
XU Qi. Where does the time go Gender differences in time use over the life course in China[J]. Journal of Chinese Women's Studies, 2018(4): 19-32.
韩中，赵晨飞，陈雅洁，等. 生命历程视角下我国居民时间分配模式及其影响机制[J]. 西北人口，
2022，43（4）：1-14.
HAN Zhong, ZHAO Chenfei, CHEN Yajie, et al. Residents' time distribution model and influencing mechanism from the perspective of life course in China[J]. Northwest Population Journal, 2022,43(4): 1-14.
CHEN F, LIU G, MAIR C A. Intergenerational ties in context: grandparents caring for grandchildren in China[J]. Social Forces, 2011, 90(2): 571-594.
TA N, LIU Z, CHAI Y. Help whom and help what? Intergenerational co-residence and the gender differences in time use among dual-earner households in Beijing, China[J]. Urban Studies,2019, 56(10): 2058-2074.
杜凤莲，张胤钰，董晓媛. 儿童照料方式对中国城镇女性劳动参与率的影响[J]. 世界经济文汇，2018（3）：1-19.
DU Fenglian, ZHANG Yinyu, DONG Xiaoyuan. Grandparents or kindergartens? The impacts of childcare choices on labor force participation of mothers with preschool children in urban China[J]. World Economic Papers, 2018(3): 1-19.
OKAMOTO K, ARAI Y, Time-geography in Japan: its application to urban life[M]. London: Routledge, 2018: 19-40.
荒井良雄，川口太郎，岡本耕平，等. 活動パス概念にもとづく主婦の外出活動の分析[J]. 都市
計画論文集，1989， 24：373-378.
KAMIYA H. Day care services and activity patterns of women in Japan[J]. GeoJournal, 1999, 48(3): 207-215.
谌丽，解扬洋，湛东升，等. 北京中低收入社区育儿人群的服务设施需求研究[J]. 人文地理，2021，36（2）：55-62.
CHEN Li, XIE Yangyang, ZHAN Dongsheng, et al. The study of the needs of service facility for child-raising people in Beijing low and middle income communities[J]. Human Geography, 2021, 36(2): 55-62.
张育庆，詹程程. 城市边缘区育儿期女性日常活动研究——以大连市甘井子区为例[J]. 辽宁师范大学学报（自然科学版），2019，42（3）：412-418.
ZHANG Yuqing, ZHAN Chengcheng. Study on daily activities of female parents in urban fringe area—taking Ganjingzi District of Dalian City as an example[J]. Journal of Liaoning Normal University (Natural Science Edition), 2019, 42(3): 412-418.
FANNING M J. Why women work closer to home[J]. Urban Studies, 1981, 18(2): 181-194.
TURNER T, NIEMEIER D. Travel to work and household responsibility: new evidence[J].Transportation, 1997, 24: 397-419.
LEE B S, MCDONALD J F. Determinants of commuting time and distance for seoul residents: the impact of family status on the commuting of women[J]. Urban Studies, 2003, 40(7): 1283-1302.
JUN M-J, KWON K-H. Why dual-earner households in seoul live closer to the wife's workplace than the husband's?[J]. Urban Policy
and Research, 2015, 33(2): 217-232.
单文顶，王小英. 支持祖辈托育：公共政策不可忽视的要素[J]. 教育科学研究，2021（9）：31-35.
SHAN Wending, WANG Xiaoying. Supporting grandparent child care: an necessary element of public policy[J]. Educational Science Research, 2021(9): 31-35.
谢栋灿，王德，钟炜菁，等. 上海市建成环境的评价与分析——基于手机信令数据的探索[J]. 城市规划，2018，42（10）：97-108.
XIE Dongcan, WANG De, ZHONG Weijing, et al. Assessment and analysis on built environment of Shanghai: an exploration based on mobile phone signaling data[J]. City Planning Review, 2018, 42(10): 97-108.
