健康城市导向下的社区花园网络营造——北京清河街道的实践
Building a Community Garden Network under the Guidance of Healthy City: The Practice in Qinghe Subdistrict, Beijing
刘佳燕
清华大学建筑学院 副教授，博士
张东旭
清华同衡规划设计研究院生态城市研究所 规划师，硕士
郑巧依
清华同衡规划设计研究院生态城市研究所 规划师，硕士
程洁心（通信作者）
清华同衡规划设计研究院生态城市研究所 主任工程师，硕士
摘要: 近年来，在生态文明思想的指导下，我国各地开展了大量生态城市与健康城市建设实践。社区花园营造作为融合绿色生态和多元共治理念、推动小微空间绿色更新和基层社会治理创新的实践，成为其中的重要内容。伴随城市更新进入留白增绿、提质增效阶段，北京市结合责任规划师制度的实施，全面推进社区微空间更新活动。海淀区清河街道依托绿色生态示范区建设，以社区花园网络营造为主题，开展了多处小微绿地更新实践。基于对国内外社区花园的主要概念、特点、路径和价值的系统梳理，以清河街道社区花园实践工作为例，阐述“双师”制度支持和健康城市导向下社区花园网络营造的总体思路，从空间支持网络化、社群支持网络化、价值传播网络化3个维度推进实施，并结合对不同层级、形式的4个代表性营造案例的剖析，从完善街区生态空间体系、促进基层社会治理、推动共建制度创新、传播绿色更新理念4个方面，总结社区花园网络体系建设对于强化生态系统服务功能与健康效益、推动实现健康城市目标的重要意义，并提出潜在问题和发展展望。
Abstract: In recent years, under the guidance of ecological civilization, a large number of practices related to the ecological city and the healthy city have been carried out throughout China. The building of community gardens, which integrates the concepts of green ecology and co-governance and aims to promote the green regeneration of community micro space and the innovation of grassroots social governance, has become an important part. As urban regeneration in Beijing enters the new stage, more and more community micro space regeneration activities have been comprehensively promoted in combination with the implementation of the principal planner system. Relying on the green ecological demonstration area project, many micro green space regeneration practices have been carried out in Qinghe Subdistrict, Haidian District, centering around the theme of creating the community garden network. Based on a systematic review of the main concept, characteristics,
paths and values of community gardens at home and abroad, and taking the practice of community garden building in Qinghe Subdistrict as an example, the thesis elaborates on the overall idea of community garden network building with the support of "principal planners - community planners" system and the guidance of healthy city, as well as the implementation strategies from the three aspects including spatial support networking, community support networking, and value dissemination networking. With the analysis of four representative building cases in different levels and forms, it summarizes the significance of community garden network building for strengthening ecosystem service functions and health benefits, and promoting the realization of a healthy city from four aspects, including improving the ecological space system of blocks, promoting the grassroots social governance, facilitating the institutional innovation in co-building, and disseminating the concept of green regeneration. Finally, the potential issues and development prospects are proposed.
关键词：健康城市；绿色城市更新；社区花园；社会治理；清河街道
Keyword: healthy city; green urban regeneration; community garden; social governance; Qinghe Subdistrict
中图分类号：TU984
文献标识码: A
资金资助
国家自然科学基金面上项目 城市社区更新减碳绩效潜力评估研究 52278068
沈清基. 论基于生态文明的新型城镇化[J]. 城市规划学刊，2013（1）：29-36.
SHEN Qingji. Study on new urbanization based on ecological civilization[J]. Urban Planning Forum,2013(1): 29-36.
翟坤周. 生态文明融入新型城镇化的空间整合与技术路径[J]. 求实，2016（6）：47-57.
ZHAI Kunzhou. The spatial integration and technical path of ecological civilization into new urbanization[J]. Truth Seeking, 2016(6): 47-57.
肖希，李敏. 绿斑密度：高密度城市绿地规划布局适用指标研究——以澳门半岛为例[J]. 中国园林，
2017，33（7）：97-102.
XIAO Xi, LI Min. Green patch density: study on the index for planning and layout of green space in highdensity cities[J]. Chinese Landscape Architecture,2017, 33(7): 97-102.
周聪惠. 城市微绿地的基本属性与规划关键问题[J]. 国际城市规划，2022，37（3）：105-113.
ZHOU Conghui. Basic attributes and key planning issues of micro green space[J]. Urban Planning International, 2022, 37(3): 105-113.
刘悦来，许俊丽，尹科娈. 高密度城市社区公共空间参与式营造——以社区花园为例[J]. 风景园林，
2019，26（6）：13-17.
LIU Yuelai, XU Junli, YIN Keluan. Participatory construction of community public space in highdensity cities—a case study of community gardens[J].Landscape Architecture, 2019, 26(6): 13-17.
侯晓蕾. 基于社区营造和多元共治的北京老城社区公共空间景观微更新——以北京老城区微花园
为例[J]. 中国园林，2019，35（12）：23-27.
HOU Xiaolei. Landscape micro-renewal of community public space in Beijing old city based on community building and multi-governance—taking the micro gardens in Beijing old city as the example[J]. Chinese Landscape Architecture, 2019, 35(12): 23-27.
刘佳燕. 基于场所营造的社区规划：北京“新清河实验”的实践探索[J]. 上海城市规划，2021（5）：1-8.
LIU Jiayan. Community planning based on placemaking: practice exploration in "New Qinghe
Experiment", Beijing[J]. Shanghai Urban Planning Review, 2021(5): 1-8.
刘佳燕. 社区规划师——制度创新与实践探索[M].北京：中国建筑工业出版社，2020.
LIU Jiayan. Community planners: institutional innovation and practical exploration[M]. Beijing:
China Architecture & Building Press, 2020.
HOU J, GROHMANN D. Integrating community gardens into urban parks: lessons in planning, design and partnership from Seattle[J]. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 2018, 33: 46-55.
钱静. 西欧份地花园与美国社区花园的体系比较[J]. 现代城市研究，2011，26（1）：86-92.
QIAN Jing. The comparison of allotment garden in Europe and community garden in the United States[J]. Modern Urban Research, 2011, 26(1): 86-92.
HE B, JIN Z. Constructing community gardens? Residents' attitude and behavior towards edible
landscapes in emerging urban communities of China[J]. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 2018, 34: 154-165.
TURNER B. Embodied connections: sustainability, food systems and community gardens[J]. Local Environment, 2011, 16(6): 509-522.
GUITART D, PICKERING C, BYRNE J A. Past results and future directions in urban community
gardens research[J]. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 2012, 11(4): 364-373.
HAYDEN S R. "Soldiers of the soil": the work of the United States School Garden Army during World WarⅠ[J]. Applied Environmental Education & Communication, 2007, 6(1): 19-29.
陈蓉蓉，金荷仙，颜越. 近20年社区花园演进历程及热点趋势研究[J]. 风景园林，2021，28（11）：114-119.
CHEN Rongrong, JIN Hexian, YAN Yue. Evolution process, hotspots and trends of community gardens in recent 20 years[J]. Landscape Architecture, 2021,28(11): 114-119.
刘悦来，魏闽，范浩阳. 社区花园理论与实践[M].上海：上海科学技术出版社，2021：2-10.
LIU Yuelai, WEI Min, FAN Haoyang. Theory and practice of community garden[M]. Shanghai:
Shanghai Science and Technology Press, 2021: 2-10.
孙睿，李一辰，王柯力，等. 基于空间潜力评价的老城区微绿地营造路径——以北京模式口街区
为例[J]. 中国城市林业，2021，19（3）：67-72.
SUN Rui, LI Yichen, WANG Keli, et al. Construction path to micro green space in old quarter based on spatial development potentials assessment: a case study of Moshikou historical block in Beijing[J]. Journal of Chinese Urban Forestry, 2021, 19(3): 67-72.
王婕，刘纯青. 社区生态文明教育：基于社区公共绿地参与式行动视角[J]. 职教论坛，2022，38（12）：92-100.
WANG Jie, LIU Chunqing. Community ecological civilization education: a perspective of participatory action of community public green space[J]. Journal of Vocational Education, 2022, 38(12): 92-100.
蒋笃君，田慧. 我国生态文明教育的内涵、现状与创新[J]. 学习与探索，2021（1）：68-73.
JIANG Dujun, TIAN Hui. The connotation, current situation and innovation of ecological civilization education in China[J]. Study & Exploration, 2021(1): 68-73.
颜越，金荷仙，王丽娴. 国内外社区花园健康效益研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报，2022，38（34）：68-
75.
YAN Yue, JIN Hexian, WANG Lixian. Research on health benefits of community gardens at home and abroad: a review[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(34): 68-75.
陆建城，罗小龙. 社区花园对健康影响的国际研究体系与展望[J]. 世界林业研究，2022，35（1）：
37-43.
LU Jiancheng, LUO Xiaolong. International research system and prospect of the influence of community gardens on health[J]. World Forestry Research, 2022,35(1): 37-43.
陈静，纪丹雯，肖扬，等. 生物多样性视角下城市闲置地的微更新探索——以临时社区花园为例
[J]. 中国园林，2019，35（12）：28-33.
CHEN Jing, JI Danwen, XIAO Yang, et al. Microrenewal exploration of urban vacant lots from the perspective of biodiversity—taking temporary community garden as the example[J]. Chinese Landscape Architecture, 2019, 35(12): 28-33.
刘佳燕，王天夫. 社区规划的社会实践：参与式城市更新及社区再造[M]. 北京：中国建筑工业出版
社，2019.
LIU Jiayan, WANG Tianfu. Social practice of community planning: participatory urban
regeneration and community rebuilding[M]. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press, 2019.
刘佳燕，邓翔宇. 北京基层空间治理的创新实践——责任规划师制度与社区规划行动策略[J]. 国际城市规划，2021，36（6）：40-47.
LIU Jiayan, DENG Xiangyu. Innovative practice of grassroots space governance in Beijing: principal planner institution and community planning action strategies[J]. Urban Planning International, 2021, 36(6): 40-47.
