台湾历史街区更新中的容积转移制度实践反思： 基于大稻埕的实施评价
Reflection on the Practice of FAR Transfer System in the Renewal of Historical Blocks in Taiwan: Based on the Implementation Evaluation of Dadaocheng
张若曦
厦门大学建筑与土木工程学院 副教授
王茹茹
厦门大学建筑与土木工程学院 硕士研究生
摘要: 历史街区在保护中发展，一直以来是城市更新的难题。容积转移作为平衡资源保护与市场开发的弹性调控机制，是协调历史街区更新中复杂多元问题的重要技术手段。通过对我国台湾地区历史街区的容积转移制度建构和20多年实践分析，对制度整体实施成效进行探讨，重点对台北市大稻埕历史街区更新中的容积转移实践进行深入剖析，对制度实施情况进行综合评价，客观认识该制度在历史街区更新中的作用、优点和不足，并提出制度反思与建议，为我国大陆地区历史街区保护更新提供经验借鉴。
Abstract: The development of historical blocks under protection has always been a difficult problem in urban renewal. As an elastic regulation mechanism to balance resource protection and market development, FAR transfer is an important technical means to coordinate the complex and diversified problems in the renewal of historical blocks. Based on the analysis of the construction and practice of the FAR transfer system of historical blocks in Taiwan, this paper discusses the overall implementation effects of the system, focuses on the in-depth analysis of the FAR transfer practice in the renewal of the historical blocks in Dadaocheng, Taipei, and provides experience for the protection and renewal of historical blocks in Mainland China.
关键词：历史街区更新；容积转移；实施评价；台湾；大稻埕
Keyword: historical district renewal; FAR transfer; implementation evaluation; Taiwan; Dadaocheng
中图分类号：TU984
文献标识码: A
资金资助
国家自然科学基金青年基金 基于VR眼动的闽南传统街巷风貌特征识别及保护机制研究 51808472
连淑芬. 新都市计划地区以容积移转方式规划取得公共设施用地之研究[D]. 新竹：中华大学，2001.
LIAN Shufen. Research on the acquisition of public facilities land in the new urban planning area by FAR transfer[D]. Hsinchu: Chung Hua University, 2001.
覃俊翰. 历史街区保护视角下的容积转移制度研究[J]. 规划师，2013，29（z1）：34-37.
QIN Junhan. FAR transfer system research in the historical block protection view[J]. Planners, 2013, 29(z1): 34-37.
肖梅乐，李依倪. 文化导向型历史街区复兴——以台湾迪化街为例[C]//共享与品质——与品质—中国城市规划年会论文集. 北京：中国建筑工业出版社，2018：1335-1346.
XIAO Meile, LI Yini. Culture-oriented historic district revival: takes Taiwan Dihua street as an example[C]//Sharing and quality: proceedings of the 2018 China Annual National Planning Conference. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press, 2018: 1335-1346.
吴宗奇. 容积移转（TDR）作为历史保存手段的神话（Myth）建构－大稻埕历史风貌街区为借镜[D]. 新北：淡江大学，2007.
WU Zongqi. The myth of historic preservation: a study on the TDR mechanism for Da-Dao-Cheng historical district[D]. New Taipei: Tamkang University, 2007.
黄舜铭. 大稻埕历史风貌特定专用区容积转移机制之研究[D]. 台北：台湾科技大学，2004.
HUANG Shunming. A study on the TDR mechanism for Da-Dao-Cheng historical district[D]. Taipei: National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, 2004.
林崇杰. 台北运用容积移转于历史保存之政策与实践之检讨[J]. 文资学报，2008（4）：27-92.
LIN Chongjie. Review of the policy and practice of applying volume transfer to historical preservation in Taipei[J]. Literature Journal, 2008(4): 27-92.
林平，陈佳佳，雷钧富，等. 大稻埕历史风貌特定专用区地方社群连结计划案[R]. 新北：台北大学都市计划研究所，2016.
LIN Ping, CHEN Jiajia, LEI Junfu, et al. Dadancheng historical features specific special area local community connection plan[R]. New Taipei: The Metropolitan Planning Institute, Taipei University, 2016.
台北市政府都市发展局. 大稻埕历史风貌特定专用区容积移转作业要点[Z]. 2003.
The Metropolitan Development Bureau of the Taipei Municipal Government. Key points of FAR transfer operation in specific special area with historical features in Dadaocheng[Z]. 2003.
台北市政府. 大稻埕历史风貌特定区容积移转办理程序[EB/OL]. （2009-01-01）[2022-06-16].https://www.docin.com/mobile/detail.do?id=139609130.
Taipei City Government. Dadaocheng historical features specific area FAR transfer procedures[EB/OL]. (2009-01-01) [2022-06-16].https://www.docin.com/mobile/detail.do?id=139609130.
张孝宇，张安录. 台湾都市更新中的容积移转制度：经验与启示[J]. 城市规划，2018，42（2）：91-96.
ZHANG Xiaoyu, ZHANG Anlu. Experience and inspiration of FAR transfer during urban renewal in Taiwan[J]. City Planning Review, 2018, 42(2): 91-96.
庄希圣. 容积移转对历史街区保存的影响——以台湾大稻埕为例[D]. 北京：清华大学，2016.
ZHUANG Xisheng. The influence of transferable development rights (TDR) for preservation of historic district - case study of Taiwan Dadaocheng historic district[D]. Beijing: Tsinghua University, 2016.
金广君，戴锏. 台湾地区容积转移制度解析[J]. 国际城市规划，2010，25（4）：104-109.
JIN Guangjun, DAI Jian. Discussion on Taiwan transfer of development right institution[J]. Urban Planning International, 2010, 25(4): 104-109.
何颖岑，阮如舫. 历史街区更新的发展权转移运用——以台北大稻埕地区为例[J]. 华中建筑，2011，29（9）：112-115.
HE Yingcen, RUAN Rufang. Historic district update using transfer of development rights: case studying of Taipei Tataocheng[J]. Huazhong Architecture, 2011, 29(9): 112-115.
刘敏霞. 历史风貌保护开发权转移制度的实施困境及对策——以上海为例[J]. 上海城市规划，2016（5）：50-53.
LIU Minxia. The dilemma and countermeasures of transfer of development right in historic townscape conservation: a case study of Shanghai[J]. Shanghai Urban Planning Review, 2016(5): 50-53.
刘琎. 基于开发权转移制度的广东省中小城市传统街区保护更新实施研究[D]. 广州：华南理工大学，2013.
LIU Jin. Research on the protection and renewal of traditional streets in small and medium-sized cities in Guangdong Province based on the development right transfer system[D]. Guangzhou: South China University of Technology, 2013.
洪敏隆. 容积移转制度“看得到吃不到”成政府解套公保地利器、变相助炒房价[EB/OL]. （2022-03-04）[2022-06-16]. https://new7.storm.mg/article/4212262.
HONG Minlong. Far FAR transfer system "only look up and not close" into the government to solve the public security weapon, to help speculation housing prices[EB/OL]. (2022-03-04) [2022-06-16]. https://new7.storm.mg/article/4212262.
