城市科技创新空间发展、影响因素与规划策略探讨* ——上海科创中心建设思考
Research on Urban Sci-tech Innovation Space Development, Influential Factors and Planning Countermeasures: A Case Study of Shanghai Science and Technology Innovation Center
李凌月
同济大学建筑与城市规划学院 助理教授，博士
张啸虎（通信作者）
香港大学建筑学院 助理教授，博士
罗 瀛
中国城市规划设计研究院上海分院 高级规划师，硕士
摘要: 我国专利申请数量在过去20年猛增200多倍，成为科技创新大国。如何进一步优化城市创新环境，推动科技创新从量的增长向质的提升转变成为具有重要意义的研究课题。以上海为例，在简要回顾城市空间、科技创新发展及其影响因素相关研究后，以“中心城—近域地区—郊区新城”空间结构为视角审视了不同圈层下的创新发展特征和差异，通过回归模型进一步探索城市中影响创新发展的因素，并基于这些分析提出优化上海创新空间发展的规划策略，为指导中国城市科技创新策源功能建设和优化提供参考。
Abstract: China has become a major country in technological innovation. It has become an important research topic on how to further optimize the urban innovation environment and promote the transformation of technological innovation from quantitative growth to qualitative improvement. This article takes Shanghai as an example to address the question. After a brief review of the relevant research, this paper examines the characteristics and differences of innovation development from the perspective of the "central city-peri urban area-suburban new town" spatial structure. Then, it applies a regression model to further explore the factors influencing the development of innovation. Based on these analyses, the planning strategies for optimizing the development of Shanghai's innovation space are discussed, with a view to guiding the construction and optimization of science and technology innovation functions in Shanghai and other Chinese mega-cities.
关键词：城市创新；空间结构；影响因素；规划策略
Keyword: urban innovation; spatial structure; influential factors; planning strategy
中图分类号：TU984
文献标识码: A
资金资助
国家自然科学基金资助项目 “政治经济视角下城市创新空间分布特征及发展机制研究：以上海为例” 51808391
ZHANG F, WU F. Rethinking the city and innovation: a political economic view from China's biotech[J]. Cities, 2018(85): 150-155.
李凌月，张啸虎，罗瀛. 基于创新产出的城市科技创新空间演化特征分析——以上海市为例[J]. 城市发展研究，2019，26（6）：87-92.
LI Lingyue, ZHANG Xiaohu, LUO Ying. Research on the evolution characteristics of innovation space from an output perspetive: a case study of Shanghai[J]. Urban Development Studies, 2019, 26(6): 87-92.
LIU F C, SIMON D F, SUN Y T, et al. China's innovation policies: evolution, institutional structure, and trajectory[J]. Research Policy, 2011, 40(7): 917-931.
BOGERS M, CHESBROUGH H, MOEDAS C. Open innovation: research, practices, and policies[J].California Management Review, 2018, 60(2): 5-16.
FELDMAN M P. The new economics of innovation, spillovers and agglomeration: a review of empirical studies[J]. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 1999, 8(1-2): 5-25.
FELDMAN M P, AUDRETSCH D B. Innovation in cities: science-based diversity, specialization and localized competition[J]. European Economic Review, 1999, 43(2): 409-429.
BETTENCOURT L M, LOBO J, HELBING D, et al. Growth, innovation, scaling, and the pace of life in cities[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2007, 104(17): 7301-7306.
MÉNDEZ R, MORAL S S. Spanish cities in the knowledge economy: theoretical debates and empirical evidence[J]. European Urban and Regional Studies, 2011, 18(2): 136-155.
BIRCH E L. Downtown in the "new American city"[J]. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 2009, 626(1): 134-153.
HALBERT L. Collaborative and collective: reflexive co-ordination and the dynamics of open innovation in the digital industry clusters of the Paris region[J]. Urban Studies, 2012, 49(11): 2357-2376.
TEIRLINCK P, SPITHOVEN A. The spatial organization of innovation: open innovation, external knowledge relations and urban structure[J]. Regional Studies, 2008, 42(5): 689-704.
STERNBERG R, KIESE M, STOCKINGER D. Cluster policies in the US and Germany: varieties of capitalism perspective on two high-tech states[J]. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 2010, 28(6): 1063-1082.
ISAKSEN A, JAKOBSEN S. New path development between innovation systems and individual actors[J]. European Planning Studies, 2017, 25(3): 355-370.
BINZ C, TRUFFER B, COENEN L. Path creation as a process of resource alignment and anchoring: industry formation for on-site water recycling in Beijing[J]. Economic Geography, 2016, 92(2): 172-200.
SIMMIE J. Path dependence and new technological path creation in the Danish wind power industry[J]. European Planning Studies, 2012, 20(5): 753-772.
WANG C C, LIN G C S. Geography of knowledge sourcing, heterogeneity of knowledge carriers and innovation of clustering firms: evidence from China's software enterprises[J]. Habitat International, 2018(71): 60-69.
TRIPPL M, TODTLING F, LENGAUER L. Knowledge sourcing beyond buzz and pipelines: evidence from the Vienna software sector[J]. Economic Geography, 2009, 85(4): 443-462.
HE S, DU D, JIAO M, et al. Spatial-temporal characteristics of urban innovation capability and impact factors analysis in China[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2017, 37(7): 1014-1022.
STERNBERG R. Regional dimensions of entrepreneurship[J]. Social Science Electronic Publishing, 2009, 5(4): 211-340.
SCHUMPETER J A. The theory of economic development: an inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle[M]. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1934.
MARX K. Das Kapital: a critique of political economy[M]. New York: Regnery, 1867/2012.
ROSENBERG N. Was Schumpeter a Marxist?[J]. Industrial & Corporate Change, 2011, 20(4): 1215-1222.
SCHIEDERIG T, TIETZE F, HERSTATT C. Green innovation in technology and innovation management - an exploratory literature review[J]. R & D Management, 2012, 42(2): 180-192.
孙娟，郑德高，马璇. 特大城市近域空间发展特征与模式研究——基于上海，武汉的探讨[J]. 城市规划学刊，2014（6）：68-76.
SUN Juan, ZHENG Degao, MA Xuan. A study on spatial development in periphery areas of mega-cities: cases of Shanghai and Wuhan[J]. Urban Planning Forum, 2014(6): 68-76.
MCGEE T G. The emergence of desakota regions in Asia: expanding a hypothesis[M]//GINSBURG N, KOPPEL B, MCGEE T G. The extended metropolis: settlement transition in Asia. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 1991: 3-25.
李凌月，徐驰. 创新导向下转型地区产业空间优化策略研究——以昆山科创载体规划为例[J]. 规划师，2019（20）：60-66.
LI Lingyue, XU Chi. Innovation-oriented industrial space optimization strategies: Kunshan case[J]. Planners, 2019(20): 60-66.
LAMBOOY J G. Knowledge and urban economic development: an evolutionary perspective[J]. Urban Studies, 2002, 39(5-6): 1019-1035.
FELDMAN M, DESROCHERS P. Research universities and local economic development: lessons from the history of the Johns Hopkins University[J]. Industry & Innovation, 2003, 10(1): 5-24.
FROMHOLD-EISEBITH M. Space(s) of innovation: regional knowledge economies[M]//MEUSBURGER P, FUNKE J, WUNDER E. Milieus of creativity: an interdisciplinary approach to spatiality of creativity. Springer Netherlands: Dordrecht, 2009: 201-218.
HÁJKOVÁ V, HÁJEK P. Efficiency of knowledge bases in urban population and economic growth – evidence from European cities[J]. Cities, 2014, 40(40): 11-22.
GUO S. Spatial-temporal characteristics and determinants of innovation output in China[J]. Modern Economy, 2019, 10(1): 12-28.
FLORIDA R. The rise of the creative class—revisited: revised and expanded[M]. New York: Basic Books, 2014.
LU L, HUANG R. Urban hierarchy of innovation capability and inter-city linkages of knowledge in post-reform China[J]. Chinese Geographical Science, 2012, 22(5): 602-616.
