社区参与居住型历史地段保护的在地性：基于社会资本分析框架*
Site-specificity on Community Involvement in Residential Historic District Conservation: Based on Social Capital Analysis Framework
王承慧
东南大学建筑学院 教授，博士
刘思佳
北京清华同衡规划设计研究院有限公司 助理规划师，硕士
摘要: 居住型历史地段反映人民群众的生活空间营建智慧，是文化自信和传承的重要空间载体，是极为重要的遗产类型。居住型历史地段保护越来越倡导社区参与，且对社区参与的有效性要求越来越高。借助在地性相关理论，为研判社区参与的有效性提供指引，而社会资本相关理论则为具体分析社区参与提供框架。选择6个在地性较好、但存在差异的国内外案例，运用由社会资本层次、社会联系类型和社会资本功能构成的分析框架，对社区参与主体及其关系进行呈现和解读，并总结有利于在地性的社区参与组织机制。最后针对国内情况提出建议。
Abstract: Reflecting the wisdom of people's living space creation, residential historical districts are of great heritage importance, as spatial carriers for cultural confidence and inheritance. Community involvement is increasingly advocated in the conservation of residential historic districts, and the effectiveness of community involvement is increasingly required. The paper points out theories on site-specificity to provide guidance on judging the effectiveness of community involvement, and theories on social capital to provide an analysis framework. Then six different cases from domestic and abroad with fair performance on site-specificity are selected for empirical research of community involvement. Using the analysis framework composed of social capital levels, social connection types and social capital functions, participants involved and their relationships are clearly illustrated and interpreted. This paper summarizes the organizational mechanisms of community involvement that are beneficial to site-specificity. Finally, some suggestions are put forward according to the domestic situation.
关键词：社区参与；居住型历史地段；在地性；场所精神；社会资本
Keyword: community involvement; residential historic district; site-specificity; genius loci; social capital
中图分类号：TU984
文献标识码: A
资金资助
国家自然科学基金项目 “基于社区研究和参与的居住型历史地段规划体系优化” 51778125
UNESCO-36C/23. Recommendation on the historic urban landscape[R]. 2011.
OWHC Regional Conference 2016. Heritage and community involvement[R]. 2016.
HARVEY D. The condition of post-modernity: an enquiry into the origins of cultural change[M]. New York: Blackwell, 1989.
丁康乐，黄丽玲，郑卫. 台湾地区社区营造探析[J]. 浙江大学学报，2018，40（6）：716-725.
DING Kangle, HUANG Liling, ZHENG Wei. The research on the community building in Taiwan Province[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University, 2018, 40(6): 716-725.
诺伯舒兹. 场所精神：迈向建筑现象学[M]. 施植明，译. 武汉：华中科技大学出版社，2010.
NORBERG-SCHULZ C. Genius loci: towards a phenomenology of architecture[M]. SHI Zhiming, translate. Wuhan: Huazhong University of Science & Technology Press, 2010.
KWON M W. One place after another: site specific art and locational identity[M]. Cambridge: The MIT Press, 2002.
侯瀚如. 走向新的在地性[J]. 周雪松，译. 东方艺术，2010（23）：62-65.
HOU Hanru. Towards a new locality[J]. ZHOU Xuesong, translate. Oriental Art, 2010(23): 62-65.
安德里亚•巴尔蒂尼. 论公共艺术的在地性[J]. 文艺理论研究，2016（2）：78-83.
BALDINI A. On the site-specificity of public art[J]. Theoretical Studies in Literature and Art, 2016(2): 78-83.
罗伯特 D 帕特南. 使民主运转起来：现代意大利的公民传统[M]. 王列，赖海榕，译. 北京：中国人民大学出版社，2015.
PUTNAM R D. Making democracy work: civic traditions in modern Italy[M]. WANG Lie, LAI Hairong, translate. Beijing: China Renmin University Press, 2015.
林南. 社会资本：关于社会结构和行动的理论[M]. 张磊，译. 上海：上海人民出版社，2005.
LIN Nan. Social capital: a theory of social structure and action[M]. ZHANG Lei, translate. Shanghai: Shanghai Renmin Press, 2005.
张庭伟. 社会资本、社区规划及公众参与[J]. 城市规划，1999（10）：23-30.
ZHANG Tingwei. Social capital: community planning and public participation[J]. City Planning Review, 1999(10): 23-30.
WOOLCOCK M. Social capital and economic development: toward a theoretical synthesis and policy framework[J]. Theory and Society, 1998, 27(2): 151-208.
SMOCK K. Democracy in action: community organizing and urban change[M]. New York: Columbia University Press, 2004.
椎原晶子.「ふるさとになれるまち」谷中の暮らしと歴史を活かすまちづくり[R]. 谷中の人々、谷中学校、東京藝術大学、ともに活動した人々との記録，2019.
台東区都市づくり部地区整備课. 谷中地区まちづくり方針（案）[R]. 平成29年.
樊星，吕斌，小泉秀樹. 日本社区营造中的魅力再生产——以东京谷中地区为例[J]. 国际城市规划，2017，32（3）：122-129.
FAN Xing, LYU Bin, KOIZUMI H. The attractiveness reproduction during the process of community planning in Japan: a case study of Yanaka District in Tokyo[J]. Urban Planning International, 2017, 32(3): 122-129.
The Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea. Kensington square conservation area appraisal draft (2017)[R]. 2017.
The Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea. Kensington square conservation area appraisal statement[R]. 1993.
Cripps Pemberton Greenish. Garden committee guide[R/OL]. (2009-12-01)[2021-06-02]. https://www.rbkc.gov.uk/council-tax/garden-squares.
The Kensington Society. Annual report 1969—70[R]. 1970.
段文，魏祥莉，余丹丹. 文化创意引导下的历史文化街区保护更新——以北京杨梅竹斜街为例[C]//新常态：传承与变革——2015中国城市规划年会论文集. 北京：中国建筑工业出版社，2015.
DUAN Wen, WEI Xiangli, YU Dandan. The protection and renewal of historical district under the guidance of cultural creativity: a case study of Yangmeizhu Xiejie in Beijing[C]//The new normal: inheritance and change——Annual National Planning Conference. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press, 2015.
李艾桦. 北京杨梅竹斜街城市更新案例研究[D]. 北京：北京建筑大学，2015.
LI Aihua. Case study on the urban renewal of Yangmeizhu Xiejie in Beijing[D]. Beijing: Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture, 2015.
温宗勇，刘瑾，郑巧依，等. 加强老城整体保护探索胡同改造途径——追寻史家胡同的历史印迹[J]. 北京规划建设，2017（6）：115-123.
WEN Zongyong, LIU Jin, ZHENG Qiaoyi, et al. Enhancing the overall protection of the old city and exploring ways to transform the Hutongs: pursuing the historical footprint of Shijia Hutong[J]. Beijing Planning Review, 2017(6): 115-123.
王兰顺. 档案揭秘史家胡同[J]. 北京规划建设，2013（3）：169-174.
WANG Lanshun. Archives revealed Shijia Hutong[J]. Beijing Planning Review, 2013(3): 169-174.
广州市爱国主义教育基地. 900年泮塘村自己活回来[EB/OL]. （2016-07-28）[2021-07-05]. https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s?src=3×tamp=1623043293&ver=1&signature=OKdbVQubzZF1EXZOkDvCN27RrYJC0mHlDT0B3dvhnWsHIyRFHwNIjwvSag*PEBPSFaPbgB2fdk2f-J8c33QBgMkO9JIN0AZs4C5aAeN3w3TZHAPvzv7aunrqC5vcDwYuXT6Rm2fUQfd9AjkuZ7ueyMpmzwaQcPlCrGRvXvs*M*4=.
Guangzhou Patriotism Education Base. Pantang Village came back to life by himself in 900[EB/OL]. (2016-07-28) [2021-07-05]. https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s?src=3×tamp=1623043293&ver=1&signature=OKdbVQubzZF1EXZOkDvCN27RrYJC0mHlDT0B3dvhnWsHIyRFHwNIjwvSag*PEBPSFaPbgB2fdk2f-J8c33QBgMkO9JIN0AZs4C5aAeN3w3TZHAPvzv7aunrqC5vcDwYuXT6Rm2fUQfd9AjkuZ7ueyMpmzwaQcPlCrGRvXvs*M*4=.
徐好好，李芃，李睿. 五图五书：泮塘五约微改造记录[J]. 建筑学报，2017（1）：113-117.
XU Haohao, LI Peng, LI Rui. Reading, planning, communicating, imaging and designing: a record of an urban micro-regeneration in Puntoon Wuyue Village[J]. Architectural Journal, 2017(1): 113-117.
新快报. 评点广州第二个历史街区微改造之民生，为何建好的口袋广场没人用？家门口有积水？[EB/OL]. （2019-12-12）[2021-05-02]. https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s?src=11×tamp=1623043536&ver=3115&signature=9w5vYsvaZHXHRHjtWNeav*TJllIf8vOe6z3pZvpdoVFcZT1XwtTMov*0-U1nBC6RlF6OYk8oVHkIEo0IdCApjUKczbp0gm2SnpM6kvaYVvnrHbM6RxtuFQH89fRuTB47&new=1.
New Express. Commenting on the people's livelihood of the second historic district in Guangzhou, why is the built pocket plaza nobody used? Is there stagnant water at your door?[EB/OL]. (2019-12-12) [2021-05-02]. https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s?src=11×tamp=1623043536&ver=3115&signature=9w5vYsvaZHXHRHjtWNeav*TJllIf8vOe6z3pZvpdoVFcZT1XwtTMov*0-U1nBC6RlF6OYk8oVHkIEo0IdCApjUKczbp0gm2SnpM6kvaYVvnrHbM6RxtuFQH89fRuTB47&new=1.
广州市荔湾区国土资源和规划局，等. 逢源大街——荔湾湖历史文化街区保护规划[R]. 2017.
Municipal Planning and Natural Resources Bureau of Liwan District of Guangzhou, et al. Fengyuan Street - Liwan Lake historical district conservation plan[R]. 2017.
陈泽漫，庄馥菁，李佳欣. 西关大屋的治理与广州老城区改造研究[J]. 清远职业技术学院学报，2016，9（2）：13-19.
CHEN Zeman, ZHUANG Fujing, LI Jiaxin. Research on governing the Xiguan House and the reconstruction of the old town in Guangzhou[J]. Journal of Qingyuan Polytechnic, 2016, 9(2): 13-19.
陈冬婕. 大型事件背景下的城市传统社区再造——以荔枝湾西关大屋社区为例[D]. 广州：中山大学，2010.
CHEN Dongjie. Research on the reconstruction of the traditional urban community under the mega-event: the case of the Lizhiwan Xiguan Maison Community[D]. Guangzhou: Sun Yat-sen University, 2010.
