上海杨浦区社区规划师在地先锋种子的共治实验
Co-governance Experiment of "Pioneer Seeds" by Community Planners in Yangpu District, Shanghai
毛键源
同济大学建筑与城市规划学院 博士研究生
刘悦来（通信作者）
同济大学建筑与城市规划学院 讲师，上海市城市更新及其空间优化技术重点实验室社区花园与社区营造分实验中心主任 四叶草堂理事长
孙彤宇
同济大学建筑与城市规划学院 教授，博士生导师
王润娴
同济大学建筑与城市规划学院 硕士研究生
摘要: 社区更新需要走向多方力量的共治共建共享。上海的杨浦区社区规划师制度即是探索在地社区规划的多方共治模式。2020年杨浦区开展社区规划师在地先锋种子的共治实验，试图通过举办共治的更新项目试点，协同政府、企业和居民，共同推动社区多方共治的在地更新。首先分析杨浦区社区规划师在地先锋种子实验的创立语境；然后从共治目标、结构和流程3个方面分析其共治机制；最后以大桥街道桥下空间的更新试点为例，从多方力量的诉求协同到多方共识下的方案生成的维度解剖其共治实施路径。
Abstract: Community renewal needs to be governed, built and shared by multiple forces. The community planner system of Yangpu District in Shanghai is to explore the multi-governance model of local community planning. In 2020, Yangpu District launched a co-governance experiment of community planners as local "pioneer seeds", and attempted to organize pilot projects of co-governance renewal, which would coordinate with local community governments, enterprises and residents to jointly promote the local renewal of multi-party co-governance. This article firstly analyzes the context of the Yangpu District community planners' "pioneer seeds" experiment. From the work target, structure and process, this paper then analyzes the working mechanism. Finally, this paper takes the renewal of under-bridge spaces in the Daqiao Sub-district as examples to dissect the co-governance implementation paths from the dimension of various power demands synergy to the generation of solutions under multilateral consensus.
关键词：社区更新；多方共治；空间治理；先锋种子；社区规划师
Keyword: community renewal; multi-governance; space governance; pioneer seeds; community planner
中图分类号：TU984
文献标识码: A
成钢. 美国社区规划师的由来、工作职责与工作内容解析[J]. 规划师，2013，29（9）：22-25.
CHENG Gang. US non-governmental community planning responsibility, model, and content[J]. Planners, 2013, 29(9): 22-25.
吴洁琳，刘伟，贺辉文. 台湾地区社区规划师职责定位演进研究[C]//活力城乡，美好人居——2019中国城市规划年会论文集. 北京：中国建筑工业出版社，2019：918-925.
WU Jielin, LIU Wei, HE Huiwen. A study on the evolution of the positioning of community planners' duties in Taiwan[C]//Vibrant city and countryside for better human habitat - proceedings of the 2019 China Annual National Planning Conference. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press, 2019: 918-925.
CULLINGWORTH B, NADIN V. Town and country planning in the UK[M]. New York: Routledge, 2006.
飨庭伸，山崎亮，小泉瑛一. 社区营造工作指南：创建街区未来的63个工作方式[M]. 上海：上海科学技术出版社，2018.
AIBA S, YAMAZAKI R, KOIZUMI Y. Guide to community creation work: 63 ways of working to create the future of a neighborhood[M]. Shanghai: Shanghai Science and Technology Publishers, 2018.
袁媛，杨贵庆，张京祥，等. 社区规划师——技术员or协调员？[J]. 城市规划，2014（11）：30-36.
YUAN Yuan, YANG Guiqing, ZHANG Jingxiang, et al. Community planner: technician or coordinator?[J]. City Planning Review, 2014(11): 30-36.
吴丹，王卫城. 深圳社区规划师制度的模式研究[J]. 规划师，2013，29（9）：36-40.
WU Dan, WANG Weicheng. Shenzhen community planner pattern research[J]. Planners, 2013, 29(9): 36-40.
深圳市规划和国土资源委员会. 深圳市规划和国土资源委员会社区规划师制度实施方案（试行）[R]. 2012.
Shenzhen Planning and Land Resources Committee. Implementation plan of community planner system of Shenzhen planning and land resources commission (for trial implementation)[R]. 2012.
刘思思，徐磊青. 社区规划师推进下的社区更新及工作框架[J]. 上海城市规划，2018（4）：28-36.
LIU Sisi, XU Leiqing. Study on the community regeneration propelled by community planners and its frame[J]. Shanghai Urban Planning Review, 2018(4): 28-36.
北京市规划和自然资源局委员会海淀分局. 海淀区街镇责任规划师工作方案（试行）[R]. 2018.
Haidian Branch of Beijing Municipal Commission of Planning and Nautral Resources. Haidian District street and town responsible planner work program (for trial implementation)[R]. 2018.
施卫良，冯斐菲，沈体雁，等. 责任规划师路在何方?[J]. 城市规划，2020，44（2）：33-39.
SHI Weiliang, FENG Feifei, SHEN Tiyan, et al. Where to go for the delegated planners?[J]. City Planning Review, 2020, 44(2): 33-39.
吴秋晴. 上海近期社区规划师制度的实践困境与对策浅议[J]. 上海城市规划，2019（z1）：48-52.
WU Qiuqing. Predicament of the recent practice of establishing community planner system in Shanghai and its countermeasure[J]. Shanghai Urban Planning Review, 2019(z1): 48-52.
